fonepaw.com 71 B
🛡️ SEO 58 🤖 GEO 82 ⚡ Perf 59 🏗️ Arch 77

fonepaw.com — Global SEODiff Score 71/100

fonepaw.com
📊

At 75/100, the ACRI for fonepaw.com indicates strong fundamentals in AI extractability, surpassing the majority of indexed sites. In the ecommerce sector, fonepaw.com outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Content is delivered server-side, meaning bots and AI agents can parse the full page without executing JavaScript. With a 2.7× bloat ratio, the page delivers its content without excessive boilerplate, giving AI systems a clean extraction path. Structured data coverage is solid at 2 blocks, covering core entities — expanding to include FAQ or Breadcrumb schemas could strengthen the profile further. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

71
B — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Traditional SEO (58) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Fix title tag length → +3 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 26, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than fonepaw.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)58 × 0.25 = 14.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)82 × 0.40 = 32.8
⚡ Performance (20% weight)59 × 0.20 = 11.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)77 × 0.15 = 11.5
Weighted sum = 14.5 + 32.8 + 11.8 + 11.5
Global SEODiff Score = 71 (B)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
42
Structure
avg 35
44
Schema
avg 10
50
Tech Stack
avg 64
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 17%
Rank #174953
Aligned
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 18%
Score 75/100

fonepaw.com has balanced Google and AI visibility — both rank roughly in the same tier. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why fonepaw.com ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
Industryecommerce
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage2 blocks
Token bloat2.7×

Fastest improvements

  • You’re already in decent shape — the next moat is monitoring drift over time.
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

58/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

99 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

180 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 5
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.fonepaw.com/tw/tutorials/mac-cannot-recognize-usb.html
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — FonePaw - Solutions to PC/iOS/Android Devices Data Recovery, Transfer, Video Recorder and Converter
  • ✓ og:description — FonePaw, your Tech Pro, aims to provide data recovery/transfer/backup software for iPhone, Android, Windows, Mac and offers easy-to-use screen recorder and video converter toolkit.
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

82/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the ecommerce sector, stylekorean.com (ACRI: 88) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
fonepaw.com
61
Your ACRI Score
88
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. stylekorean.com has schema coverage of 4 blocks and uses Custom / Proprietary. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 42/100 — Fair
Structured Elements 78 elements (78 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1483
Raw Density5.3%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks2 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

2/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

68
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability68/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

37%
🗑️ 63%
Useful Content (65.5 KB)Bloat (108.1 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio2.7× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context5% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage8 / 164 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Only 5% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

57 Entropy
Fair Token Bloat: Medium
Noise Ratio: 62.3% · SNR: 0.61 · Signal: 16756 / Noise: 27671 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
Servernginx
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time602 ms
Raw HTML Size173.5 KB
Visible Text Size65.5 KB

Performance & Speed

59/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

602 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1250
DOM nodes
174 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

2
tracker scripts
2
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
googletagmanager.comgooglesyndication.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

77/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.fonepaw.com/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

216
internal links
45
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 61/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for fonepaw.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/fonepaw.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=fonepaw.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 4 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
61
Single-page score
-6
Moderate hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
56
Avg across 4 pages · Range 41–64
Topical Cohesion
9%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
2033
Avg Bloat
103.7×
Ext. Citations
9
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://fonepaw.com/about
About FonePaw - Committed to Mobile Solutions
about 64 28.1× 1006
https://fonepaw.com/products
Products - Download FonePaw Software Right Now
product 64 49.0× 602
https://fonepaw.com/faq
Échec de l'inscription ? Comment réparer l'erreur de réseau d'enregistrement
pricing 54 62.1× 310 💰 Pricing
https://fonepaw.com/contact
Submit a request | FonePaw Support Center
support 41 275.5× 115
🔗
Outbound External Citations
9 unique external domains cited across 4 pages
dl.fonepaw.com ×4
youtube.com ×4
twitter.com ×4
facebook.com ×4
blog.fonepaw.com ×3
passvers.com ×1
filehorse.com ×1
blog.fonepaw.fr ×1
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/fonepaw.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar ecommerce Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to fonepaw.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
fonepaw.com (this site) 61 75 Custom / Proprietary 2.7× 2
servistores.com 61 78 Custom / Proprietary 2.6× 2 Compare →
historiadomundo.com.br 61 77 Custom / Proprietary 2.5× 2 Compare →
zahraj.sk 61 74 Custom / Proprietary 3.1× 2 Compare →
jehla.cz 61 15 Custom / Proprietary 2.3× 2 Compare →
dizma.bg 61 75 Custom / Proprietary 2.3× 2 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to fonepaw.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Fonepaw?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Fonepaw does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Fonepaw work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Fonepaw."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for fonepaw.com:

Current Score
75
Projected Score
78
Improvement
+3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history