fittin.ru 74 B
🛡️ SEO 80 🤖 GEO 83 ⚡ Perf 39 🏗️ Arch 86

fittin.ru — Global SEODiff Score 74/100

fittin.ru
📊

The AI-Readiness profile for fittin.ru is strong: an ACRI of 78/100 places it ahead of 88% of domains in the index. Within the ecommerce vertical, this places fittin.ru above the industry average of 58 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. The low ghost ratio (5%) confirms that what crawlers see matches what users see — a hallmark of strong SSR implementation. With a 3.6× bloat ratio, the page delivers its content without excessive boilerplate, giving AI systems a clean extraction path. The presence of 7 structured data blocks ensures search engines and AI agents can accurately classify and extract entities from the page. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

74
B — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (39) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Fix title tag length → +3 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 26, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than fittin.ru?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)80 × 0.25 = 20.0
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)83 × 0.40 = 33.2
⚡ Performance (20% weight)39 × 0.20 = 7.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)86 × 0.15 = 12.9
Weighted sum = 20.0 + 33.2 + 7.8 + 12.9
Global SEODiff Score = 74 (B)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
12
Structure
avg 36
94
Schema
avg 9
70
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 11%
Rank #105137
Aligned
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 12%
Score 78/100

fittin.ru has balanced Google and AI visibility — both rank roughly in the same tier. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why fittin.ru ranks here

Tech stackNext.js
Industryecommerce
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage7 blocks
Token bloat3.6×

Fastest improvements

  • You’re already in decent shape — the next moat is monitoring drift over time.
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

80/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

82 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

253 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 18
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://fittin.ru
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ru
  • ✓ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Разработка мобильных приложений на Flutter | FITTIN
  • ✓ og:description — Разработка мобильных приложений для iOS и Android. Лидеры Flutter. 11 первых мест Рейтинга Рунета 2025. Создаем приложения с ИИ за 7-30 дней. 200+ проектов.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

83/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the ecommerce sector, stylekorean.com (ACRI: 88) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
fittin.ru
64
Your ACRI Score
88
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. stylekorean.com has schema coverage of 4 blocks and uses Custom / Proprietary. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 12/100 — Poor
Structured Elements 9 elements (9 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1993
Raw Density0.4%
💡Low structure score (12/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 9 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ✅ Present
Total Schema Blocks7 blocks

Schema Coverage Map

6/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
✅ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
✅ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

72
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability72/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (60/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

27%
🗑️ 73%
Useful Content (84.4 KB)Bloat (223.1 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio3.6× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context100% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage65 / 65 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

35 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 72.6% · SNR: 0.38 · Signal: 21600 / Noise: 57102 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkNext.js
AI-Readiness Score70/100
Server
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1717 ms
Raw HTML Size307.4 KB
Visible Text Size84.4 KB

Performance & Speed

39/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1717 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1520
DOM nodes
307 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → max-age=3600
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

86/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://fittin.ru/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

23
internal links
36
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ru
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 64/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for fittin.ru
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/fittin.ru" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=fittin.ru" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 2 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
64
Single-page score
+13
Subpages outperform homepage
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
78
Avg across 2 pages · Range 75–80
Total Words
2652
Avg Bloat
21.0×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://fittin.ru/faq
FAQ - Часто задаваемые вопросы | FITTIN - Разработка мобильных приложений
support 80 16.0× 1475
https://fittin.ru/blog
Блог о разработке мобильных приложений на Flutter | FITTIN
blog 75 26.1× 1177
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/faq/ 1 80 0% 16.0× High JS Bloat
/blog/ 1 75 0% 26.1× High JS Bloat
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/fittin.ru

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar ecommerce Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to fittin.ru. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
fittin.ru (this site) 64 78 Next.js 3.6× 7
stickermaster.nl 82 85 PrestaShop 2.3× 6 Compare →
materiels-electriques.fr 83 91 WordPress 3.2× 5 Compare →
ilovebike.it 83 87 PrestaShop 3.0× 5 Compare →
tl.emojiguide.com 84 90 WordPress 3.6× 4 Compare →
bricoman.pl 85 87 Custom / Proprietary 5.2× 5 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history