expasy.org 62 C
🛡️ SEO 26 🤖 GEO 88 ⚡ Perf 33 🏗️ Arch 94

expasy.org — Global SEODiff Score 62/100

expasy.org
📊

At 81/100, the ACRI for expasy.org indicates strong fundamentals in AI extractability, surpassing the majority of indexed sites. Content is delivered server-side, meaning bots and AI agents can parse the full page without executing JavaScript. A tight 2.1× token bloat ratio reflects disciplined markup: minimal noise between the crawler and the content it needs. Minimal structured data (1 block) limits the site's ability to communicate entity relationships to AI systems. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

62
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Traditional SEO (26) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Monitor weekly to catch regressions early
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 26, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 3 snapshots
Feb 23 Feb 26
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than expasy.org?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)26 × 0.25 = 6.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)88 × 0.40 = 35.2
⚡ Performance (20% weight)33 × 0.20 = 6.6
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)94 × 0.15 = 14.1
Weighted sum = 6.5 + 35.2 + 6.6 + 14.1
Global SEODiff Score = 62 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
100
Structure
avg 36
2
Schema
avg 9
55
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 6%
Rank #55364
Aligned
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 5%
Score 81/100

expasy.org has balanced Google and AI visibility — both rank roughly in the same tier. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why expasy.org ranks here

Tech stackExpress
Industry
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat2.1×

Fastest improvements

  • You’re already in decent shape — the next moat is monitoring drift over time.
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

26/100 25 % of Global Score 🟡 Medium Confidence

📝 Title Tag

46 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

99 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 0
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 3
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✗ Canonical tag present
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✗ og:title
  • ✗ og:description
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

88/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 100/100 — Excellent
Structured Elements 1070 elements (1070 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words2252
Raw Density47.5%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

75
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability75/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (50/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

47%
🗑️ 53%
Useful Content (219.8 KB)Bloat (231.4 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio2.1× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context67% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage2 / 3 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

73 Entropy
Good Token Bloat: Low
Noise Ratio: 51.3% · SNR: 0.95 · Signal: 56260 / Noise: 59236 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

A local LLM (mlx-community/gemma-3-4b-it-qat-4bit) analyzed the extracted content of expasy.org and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
ExpasyGPT leverages Large Language Models to translate user questions into SPARQL queries, enabling access to structured biological knowledge in natural language without requiring SPARQL expertise.
Target Audience
Bioinformaticians, researchers, data scientists, and anyone needing to query biological databases using natural language.
Pricing Model
⚠ SEMANTIC VOID
🔗 Integration Partners
UniProtOMABgeeCellosaurusSwissLipidsRheaSTRINGOrthoDB
🏆 Competitive Moat
AI-powered SPARQL query generation and federated query support, combined with a user-friendly interface and a growing collection of example queries.
📊 Content Depth
8/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Integration directory pagesTemplate comparison pagesFederated query examples
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Complex SPARQL syntax
• Lack of SPARQL expertise among users
• Difficulty integrating data from multiple sources
Model: mlx-community/gemma-3-4b-it-qat-4bit · Analyzed: 2026-02-28 · Data extracted from the site’s main content via strict JSON prompting.

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkExpress
AI-Readiness Score55/100
Servernginx
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1490 ms
Raw HTML Size451.2 KB
Visible Text Size219.8 KB

Performance & Speed

33/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1490 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

4153
DOM nodes
451 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → private, must-revalidate
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

94/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.expasy.org/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

182
internal links
2
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 77/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for expasy.org
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/expasy.org" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=expasy.org" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 181 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
77
Single-page score
-18
Moderate hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
60
Avg across 181 pages · Range 44–90
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 77, but internal pages average only 60 — a -18-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Topical Cohesion
4%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
98598
Avg Bloat
37.1×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.expasy.org/help
Expasy Help - SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics
pricing 90 4.8× 1447 💰 Pricing
https://www.expasy.org/terms-of-use
Terms of Use - SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics
legal 85 5.1× 578
https://www.expasy.org/about-chat
About ExpasyGPT - SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics
about 85 5.2× 1512
https://www.expasy.org/archives/ateliers-bioinformatique
Ateliers de bioinformatique
other 85 6.1× 584
https://www.expasy.org/about
About Expasy - SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics
about 75 7.1× 400
https://expasy.org/about
About Expasy - SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics
about 75 7.1× 400
https://expasy.org/features
About Expasy - SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics
product 75 7.1× 400
https://www.expasy.org/archives/nextprot
neXtProt
other 75 8.1× 386
https://www.expasy.org/archives/epd
EPD - Eukaryotic Promoter Database
other 65 11.0× 250
https://www.expasy.org/resources/bgee
Bgee - SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics
blog 64 40.4× 860
https://www.expasy.org/resources/melanie
MELANIE - SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics
blog 64 36.8× 815
https://www.expasy.org/resources/nextprot
neXtProt - SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics
blog 64 39.7× 672
https://www.expasy.org/resources/string
STRING - SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics
blog 64 40.4× 934
https://www.expasy.org/resources/swisslipids
SwissLipids - SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics
blog 64 39.1× 509
https://www.expasy.org/resources/metanetx
MetaNetX - SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics
blog 64 39.7× 1003
https://www.expasy.org/resources/venom-zone
VenomZone - SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics
blog 64 37.6× 692
https://www.expasy.org/resources/cellosaurus
Cellosaurus - SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics
pricing 64 39.0× 804 💰 Pricing
https://www.expasy.org/resources/v-pipe
V-pipe - SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics
blog 64 38.9× 727
https://www.expasy.org/resources/scanprosite
ScanProsite - SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics
blog 64 37.6× 615
https://www.expasy.org/resources/ismara
ISMARA - SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics
blog 64 40.5× 636
Showing 20 of 100 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/resources/ 169 59 0% 38.9× High JS Bloat
/archives/ 3 75 0% 8.4× High JS Bloat
/contact/ 2 47 0% 31.0× High JS Bloat
/about/ 2 75 0% 7.1× High JS Bloat
/about-chat/ 1 85 0% 5.2× High JS Bloat
/features/ 1 75 0% 7.1× High JS Bloat
/help/ 1 90 0% 4.8× Healthy
/terms-of-use/ 1 85 0% 5.1× High JS Bloat
/chat/ 1 55 0% 18.3× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 181 pages
sib.swiss ×181
creativecommons.org ×58
youtube.com ×51
elixir-europe.org ×46
gnu.org ×22
doi.org ×21
web.expasy.org ×17
github.com ×15
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/expasy.org

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to expasy.org. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
expasy.org (this site) 77 81 Express 2.1× 1
tilibraexpress.com.br 87 87 Express 1.9× 3 Compare →
decoforhome.com 86 87 Express 3.0× 4 Compare →
sos-accessoire.com 86 93 Express 2.5× 13 Compare →
sos-ricambi.it 86 94 Express 2.6× 13 Compare →
247garden.com 86 94 Express 5.9× 23 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to expasy.org. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Expasy",
  "url": "https://expasy.org",
  "logo": "https://expasy.org/img/favicon.ico",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Expasy",
  "url": "https://expasy.org",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://expasy.org/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Expasy?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Expasy does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Expasy work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Expasy."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for expasy.org:

Current Score
81
Projected Score
94
Improvement
+13 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history