eplaneta.rs 61 C
🛡️ SEO 41 🤖 GEO 83 ⚡ Perf 24 🏗️ Arch 83

eplaneta.rs — Global SEODiff Score 61/100

eplaneta.rs
📊

At 83/100, the ACRI for eplaneta.rs indicates strong fundamentals in AI extractability, surpassing the majority of indexed sites. Within the gaming vertical, this places eplaneta.rs above the industry average of 58 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Content is delivered server-side, meaning bots and AI agents can parse the full page without executing JavaScript. With a 3.3× bloat ratio, the page delivers its content without excessive boilerplate, giving AI systems a clean extraction path. Structured data coverage is solid at 2 blocks, covering core entities — expanding to include FAQ or Breadcrumb schemas could strengthen the profile further. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

61
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (24) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add HSTS header → +2 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 26, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than eplaneta.rs?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)41 × 0.25 = 10.2
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)83 × 0.40 = 33.2
⚡ Performance (20% weight)24 × 0.20 = 4.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)83 × 0.15 = 12.4
Weighted sum = 10.2 + 33.2 + 4.8 + 12.4
Global SEODiff Score = 61 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
81
Structure
avg 36
44
Schema
avg 9
55
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 8%
Rank #75812
Aligned
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 3%
Score 83/100

eplaneta.rs has balanced Google and AI visibility — both rank roughly in the same tier. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why eplaneta.rs ranks here

Tech stackExpress
Industrygaming
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage2 blocks
Token bloat3.3×

Fastest improvements

  • You’re already in decent shape — the next moat is monitoring drift over time.
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

41/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

20 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

169 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 0
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 1
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://eplaneta.rs/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → sr
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — ePlaneta - To je to!
  • ✓ og:description — Sve na jednom mestu - Tehnika, televizori, kućni aparati, obuća, odeća, auto program, sve za dvorište, alati, mašine, kućna galanterija, sve za kuhinju, igračke..
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

83/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the gaming sector, tehnomarket.ua (ACRI: 85) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
eplaneta.rs
76
Your ACRI Score
85
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. tehnomarket.ua has schema coverage of 2 blocks and uses Cloudflare Pages. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 81/100 — Excellent
Structured Elements 2994 elements (2994 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words15294
Raw Density19.6%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks2 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

2/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

80
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability80/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (85/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

30%
🗑️ 70%
Useful Content (613.4 KB)Bloat (1422.8 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio3.3× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context99% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage331 / 336 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

43 Entropy
Fair Token Bloat: Medium
Noise Ratio: 69.9% · SNR: 0.43 · Signal: 157036 / Noise: 364249 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

A local LLM (mlx-community/gemma-3-4b-it-qat-4bit) analyzed the extracted content of eplaneta.rs and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
ePlaneta provides a wide range of products for home and lifestyle needs.
Target Audience
Shoppers, homeowners, families seeking diverse household goods.
Pricing Model
⚠ SEMANTIC VOID
🏆 Competitive Moat
SEMANTIC VOID
📊 Content Depth
1/10
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Lack of clear value proposition
• Poor SEO due to minimal content
Model: mlx-community/gemma-3-4b-it-qat-4bit · Analyzed: 2026-02-28 · Data extracted from the site’s main content via strict JSON prompting.

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkExpress
AI-Readiness Score55/100
Servernginx/1.20.1
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1494 ms
Raw HTML Size2036.3 KB
Visible Text Size613.4 KB

Performance & Speed

24/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1494 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

18321
DOM nodes
2036 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → max-age=0, must-revalidate, no-cache, no-store
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

83/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://eplaneta.rs/zsdev_sitemap/sitemap_index.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

3267
internal links
13
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → sr
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 76/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for eplaneta.rs
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/eplaneta.rs" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=eplaneta.rs" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

🔗 Similar gaming Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to eplaneta.rs. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
eplaneta.rs (this site) 76 83 Express 3.3× 2
arreglatelo.es 78 81 Express 2.4× 2 Compare →
redmujeres.org 76 79 Express 1.7× 3 Compare →
nicegarden.com.ua 76 81 Express 6.6× 2 Compare →
stealth-gamer.com 79 90 Express 5.5× 13 Compare →
technoperry.com 76 84 Custom / Proprietary 2.9× 2 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite eplaneta.rs when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to eplaneta.rs. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Eplaneta?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Eplaneta does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Eplaneta work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Eplaneta."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for eplaneta.rs:

Current Score
83
Projected Score
86
Improvement
+3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history