dainst.org 64 C
🛡️ SEO 41 🤖 GEO 85 ⚡ Perf 39 🏗️ Arch 77

dainst.org — Global SEODiff Score 64/100

dainst.org
📊

At 76/100, the ACRI for dainst.org indicates strong fundamentals in AI extractability, surpassing the majority of indexed sites. Compared to other news sites (avg score: 58), dainst.org performs above the benchmark, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Server-side rendering keeps the ghost ratio near zero, giving AI systems direct access to all visible content. A tight 1.5× token bloat ratio reflects disciplined markup: minimal noise between the crawler and the content it needs. The complete absence of JSON-LD schema is a missed opportunity: even basic Organization markup would improve how AI crawlers understand this domain. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

64
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (39) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add Organization + WebSite JSON-LD → +5–8 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 26, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 3 snapshots
Feb 23 Feb 26
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than dainst.org?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)41 × 0.25 = 10.2
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)85 × 0.40 = 34.0
⚡ Performance (20% weight)39 × 0.20 = 7.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)77 × 0.15 = 11.5
Weighted sum = 10.2 + 34.0 + 7.8 + 11.5
Global SEODiff Score = 64 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
74
Structure
avg 36
0
Schema
avg 9
60
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 7%
Rank #66969
+10 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 16%
Score 76/100

dainst.org shows stronger AI visibility than traditional SEO ranking. Great AI foundation to build on. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why dainst.org ranks here

Tech stackTYPO3
Industrynews
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage0 blocks
Token bloat1.5×

Fastest improvements

  • Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

41/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

16 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

0 chars
Missing

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 21
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.dainst.org/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → de-de
  • ✓ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Deutsches Archäologisches Institut - www.dainst.org
  • ✗ og:description
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

85/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the news sector, news.pchome.com.tw (ACRI: 85) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
dainst.org
68
Your ACRI Score
85
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. news.pchome.com.tw has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses Custom / Proprietary. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 74/100 — Good
Structured Elements 296 elements (296 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1792
Raw Density16.5%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks0 — No JSON-LD detected

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

67
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability67/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (50/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

66%
🗑️ 34%
Useful Content (196.2 KB)Bloat (94.4 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio1.5× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context65% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage26 / 40 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

88 Entropy
Good Token Bloat: Low
Noise Ratio: 32.5% · SNR: 2.08 · Signal: 50225 / Noise: 24163 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkTYPO3
AI-Readiness Score60/100
ServerApache
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1484 ms
Raw HTML Size290.6 KB
Visible Text Size196.2 KB

Performance & Speed

39/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1484 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1574
DOM nodes
291 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → private, no-store, max-age=0
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

77/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.dainst.org/generated/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

349
internal links
12
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → de-de
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 68/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for dainst.org
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/dainst.org" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=dainst.org" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 57 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
68
Single-page score
-22
Severe hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
46
Avg across 57 pages · Range 36–59
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 68, but internal pages average only 46 — a -22-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Topical Cohesion
9%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
21161
Avg Bloat
161.0×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.dainst.org/forschung/projekte/noslug/2598
DAI - "Schätze der Archäologie und Kultur Vietnams"
other 59 47.2× 1045
https://www.dainst.org/forschung/projekte/noslug/5630
DAI - Äthiopisch-deutsche Forschungen in Wukro
other 59 89.1× 552
https://www.dainst.org/forschung/projekte/noslug/5961
DAI - ArcHerNet | Virtuelle Museumssammlungen des Jemen – Post-Conflict Recovery of Yemeni Museums
other 56 93.0× 510
https://www.dainst.org/forschung/projekte/noslug/5536
DAI - Bariano. Der frühchristliche Baukomplex im ehemaligen Karmeliter-Konvent „dei Neveri“
other 56 94.5× 509
https://www.dainst.org/forschung/projekte/noslug/5829
DAI - Archaeology and Palaeoecology of the Inner Congo Basin
other 56 88.6× 538
https://www.dainst.org/forschung/projekte/noslug/2416
DAI - Bronze- und früheisenzeitliche Hortfunde der Kolchis-Kultur in West- und Zentralkaukasien
other 56 89.2× 530
https://www.dainst.org/forschung/projekte/noslug/5676
DAI - 150 Jahre DAI Athen. Jubiläum 2024 - Institutsgeschichte
other 56 66.7× 737
https://www.dainst.org/forschung/projekte/noslug/2222
DAI - Afghanistan: Antiker Bergbau und Ressourcennutzung
other 56 87.3× 555
https://www.dainst.org/forschung/projekte/agrarwelten-mesopotamiens/5621
DAI - Agrarwelten Mesopotamiens
other 56 91.1× 532
https://www.dainst.org/forschung/projekte/archaeologische-forschung-und-kulturgueterschutz-in-eswatini/5670
DAI - Archäologische Forschung und Kulturgüterschutz in Eswatini
other 56 90.0× 544
https://www.dainst.org/forschung/projekte/archaeologisches-projekt-nasca-palpa-peru/2558
DAI - Archäologisches Projekt Nasca-Palpa, Peru
other 56 84.9× 578
https://www.dainst.org/forschung/projekte/buergerwissenschaftsprojekt-transkription-handschriftlicher-dokumentation-der-olympiagrabung/5934
DAI - Bürgerwissenschaftsprojekt "Transkription von Notiz- und Tagebüchern der Olympiagrabung"
other 46 145.3× 328
https://www.dainst.org/forschung/projekte/noslug/2808
DAI - Brot und Spiele - Der Ausbau des südwestlichen Stadtquartiers Karthagos
other 46 129.8× 368
https://www.dainst.org/forschung/projekte/bridging-eurasia-besiedlungsgeschichte-und-klimawandel-in-nordostasien-seit-der-letzten-eiszeit/2848
DAI - Bridging Eurasia - Besiedlungsgeschichte und Klimawandel in Nordostasien seit der letzten Eiszeit
other 46 106.3× 450
https://www.dainst.org/forschung/projekte/noslug/5715
DAI - Ancient Yemen Digital Atlas
other 46 108.3× 444
https://www.dainst.org/forschung/projekte/aegaron-ein-online-repositorium-fuer-standardisierte-plaene-und-daten-altaeg/2432
DAI - Aegaron - Ein Online-Repositorium für standardisierte Pläne und Daten altägyptischer Architektur
other 46 138.7× 343
https://www.dainst.org/forschung/projekte/noslug/2186
DAI - Antike Besiedlungsgeschichte der Taman'-Halbinsel (Rus.), Griech. Kolonisation
other 46 196.0× 251
https://www.dainst.org/forschung/projekte/noslug/2474
DAI - Bandichan, Surchandar´ja, Usbekistan
other 46 150.4× 318
https://www.dainst.org/forschung/projekte/archaeo-informatics/5929
DAI - Archaeo-Informatics
other 46 200.5× 238
https://www.dainst.org/forschung/projekte/archaeological-heritage-network/2418
DAI - Archaeological Heritage Network
other 46 115.1× 417
Showing 20 of 57 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/forschung/ 57 46 0% 161.0× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 57 pages
web.facebook.com ×57
instagram.com ×57
bsky.app ×57
idai.world ×57
aliph-foundation.org ×1
baotanglichsu.vn ×1
auswaertiges-amt.de ×1
rem-mannheim.de ×1
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/dainst.org

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar news Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to dainst.org. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
dainst.org (this site) 68 76 TYPO3 1.5× 0
ukw.de 77 80 TYPO3 1.6× 0 Compare →
stiftungen.org 75 77 TYPO3 2.0× 2 Compare →
hhla.de 79 81 TYPO3 2.4× 1 Compare →
uks.eu 75 80 TYPO3 10.0× 2 Compare →
medi.de 84 83 TYPO3 1.6× 5 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite dainst.org when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to dainst.org. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Dainst",
  "url": "https://dainst.org",
  "logo": "https://dainst.org/typo3conf/ext/wfdaiwebsite/Resources/Public/Icons/favicon.ico",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Dainst",
  "url": "https://dainst.org",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://dainst.org/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Dainst?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Dainst does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Dainst work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Dainst."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for dainst.org:

Current Score
76
Projected Score
89
Improvement
+13 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history