caloo.jp 72 B
🛡️ SEO 51 🤖 GEO 87 ⚡ Perf 59 🏗️ Arch 83

caloo.jp — Global SEODiff Score 72/100

caloo.jp
📊

At 80/100, the ACRI for caloo.jp indicates strong fundamentals in AI extractability, surpassing the majority of indexed sites. Its server-rendered architecture ensures AI crawlers receive complete HTML on first request, a key advantage for extractability. The token bloat ratio sits at a lean 3.2×, meaning the ratio of code to visible content is efficient — crawlers spend their token budget on actual information. The site includes 2 schema blocks, providing adequate structured data for basic entity recognition. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

72
B — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Traditional SEO (51) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Monitor weekly to catch regressions early
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 21, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 22 snapshots
Feb 22 Mar 21
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
🔄 Mar 12 Content change detected
🔄 Mar 5 Content change detected
🔄 Feb 28 Content change detected
Does your site score higher than caloo.jp?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)51 × 0.25 = 12.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)87 × 0.40 = 34.8
⚡ Performance (20% weight)59 × 0.20 = 11.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)83 × 0.15 = 12.4
Weighted sum = 12.8 + 34.8 + 11.8 + 12.4
Global SEODiff Score = 72 (B)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
100
Structure
avg 35
4
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 6%
Rank #63715
Aligned
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 6%
Score 80/100

caloo.jp has balanced Google and AI visibility — both rank roughly in the same tier. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why caloo.jp ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
Industry
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage2 blocks
Token bloat3.2×

Fastest improvements

  • You’re already in decent shape — the next moat is monitoring drift over time.
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

51/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

70 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

372 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 8
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 13
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://caloo.jp/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✗ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ja
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — 病院の評判やランキングも! 病院口コミ検索カルー
  • ✓ og:description — 病院口コミ、病院検索、病院ランキングなら、病院口コミ検索カルー。全国の病院、クリニック、歯科を口コミ、評判、治療実績・手術件数から探せます。さらに専門医・専門外来・女医など多様な検索も可能です。病院口コミ検索カルーでおすすめの病院を見つけませんか?
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

87/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 100/100 — Excellent
Structured Elements 241 elements (232 lists, 5 rows, 4 headers)
Total Words529
Raw Density45.6%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks2 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

2/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

76
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability76/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (10/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

31%
🗑️ 69%
Useful Content (13.1 KB)Bloat (28.3 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio3.2× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context41% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage7 / 17 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Only 41% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

45 Entropy
Fair Token Bloat: Medium
Noise Ratio: 68.3% · SNR: 0.46 · Signal: 3359 / Noise: 7252 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of caloo.jp and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
病院口コミ、評判、ランキングから病院を探す
Target Audience
患者、医療関係者
Pricing Model
免费
🏆 Competitive Moat
提供全国病院、诊所、牙科的评价和排名
📊 Content Depth
5/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
病院口コミ検索カルーエリアから病院を探す内科系外科系皮膚科系泌尿器科・肛門科系眼科系耳鼻咽喉科系産婦人科系小児科系精神科系歯科系
⚡ Key Pain Points
• 内容较为简略,缺乏详细信息
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-02-27

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
Servernginx/1.28.0
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1807 ms
Raw HTML Size41.5 KB
Visible Text Size13.1 KB

Performance & Speed

59/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1807 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

909
DOM nodes
42 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

1
tracker scripts
1
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
doubleclick.net
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

83/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://caloo.jp/sitefeeds/allhospitals
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

219
internal links
10
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ja
  • ✗ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 74/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for caloo.jp
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/caloo.jp" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=caloo.jp" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 68 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
74
Single-page score
-23
Severe hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
51
Avg across 68 pages · Range 0–75
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 74, but internal pages average only 51 — a -23-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Topical Cohesion
37%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
19882
Avg Bloat
25.5×
RAG Fractures [?]
6
⚠️
6 RAG-Chunking Fractures Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 6 pages will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://caloo.jp/hospitals/detail/1010001090
札幌北楡病院の口コミ・評判 (12件) | 病院口コミ検索カルー
pricing 75 17.9× 1261 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://caloo.jp/hospitals/detail/1010001170
新札幌整形外科病院の口コミ・評判 (6件) | 病院口コミ検索カルー
pricing 70 23.8× 676 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://caloo.jp/hospitals/detail/4010000272
さっぽろ北口クリニックの口コミ・評判 (8件) | 病院口コミ検索カルー
pricing 70 27.8× 578 💰 Pricing
https://caloo.jp/hospitals/detail/1010001340
北海道整形外科記念病院の口コミ・評判 (29件) | 病院口コミ検索カルー
pricing 70 22.7× 838 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://caloo.jp/hospitals/detail/2010007660
ほしい小児科・整形外科の口コミ・評判 (8件) | 病院口コミ検索カルー
pricing 70 29.2× 559 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://caloo.jp/hospitals/detail/4010001846
Fビレッジこどもクリニック | 病院口コミ検索カルー
pricing 60 28.1× 247 💰 Pricing
https://caloo.jp/hospitals/detail/4010002005
sumiGクリニック | 病院口コミ検索カルー
pricing 60 31.2× 255 💰 Pricing
https://caloo.jp/hospitals/detail/4010001758
メンズライフクリニック 札幌院 | 病院口コミ検索カルー
pricing 60 29.2× 236 💰 Pricing
https://caloo.jp/hospitals/detail/2010007420
さかい眼科クリニックの口コミ・評判 (1件) | 病院口コミ検索カルー
pricing 60 29.7× 343 💰 Pricing
https://caloo.jp/hospitals/detail/4010002006
植物園前ライラック皮膚科 | 病院口コミ検索カルー
pricing 60 25.6× 330 💰 Pricing
https://caloo.jp/hospitals/detail/4010002013
おひさまホームクリニック | 病院口コミ検索カルー
pricing 60 33.0× 240 💰 Pricing
https://caloo.jp/hospitals/detail/4010002001
こいねの杜クリニック | 病院口コミ検索カルー
pricing 60 31.7× 252 💰 Pricing
https://caloo.jp/hospitals/detail/1010004900
浜頓別町国民健康保険病院の口コミ・評判 (2件) | 病院口コミ検索カルー
pricing 60 28.8× 366 💰 Pricing
https://caloo.jp/hospitals/detail/4010001521
クリニック むすかりの口コミ・評判 (1件) | 病院口コミ検索カルー
pricing 60 33.6× 279 💰 Pricing
https://caloo.jp/hospitals/detail/4010002007
いしやま通10条歯科クリニック | 病院口コミ検索カルー
pricing 60 25.7× 324 💰 Pricing
https://caloo.jp/hospitals/detail/3010019800
水野歯科 | 病院口コミ検索カルー
pricing 60 28.2× 236 💰 Pricing
https://caloo.jp/hospitals/detail/2010013670
山口整形外科クリニックの口コミ・評判 (7件) | 病院口コミ検索カルー
pricing 60 29.8× 492 💰 Pricing
https://caloo.jp/hospitals/detail/4010002022
にじいろこどもクリニック | 病院口コミ検索カルー
pricing 60 28.7× 294 💰 Pricing
https://caloo.jp/hospitals/detail/4010002004
クリニックフォア札幌アスティ | 病院口コミ検索カルー
pricing 60 28.0× 308 💰 Pricing
https://caloo.jp/hospitals/detail/3010011580
医療法人社団宗和会おとわ歯科医院の口コミ・評判 (3件) | 病院口コミ検索カルー
pricing 60 29.5× 416 💰 Pricing
Showing 20 of 68 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/hospitals/ 58 60 0% 29.9× High JS Bloat
/pricing/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/about/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/products/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/contact/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/faq/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/integrations/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/blog/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/docs/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 68 pages
medtube.jp ×58
wmk.clinic-magazine.jp ×58
facebook.com ×58
doctors-interview.jp ×58
staff.caloo.jp ×58
recruit.caloo.co.jp ×58
twitter.com ×58
clinic-magazine.jp ×58
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/caloo.jp

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to caloo.jp. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
caloo.jp (this site) 74 80 Custom / Proprietary 3.2× 2
negoziodelvino.it 84 86 Custom / Proprietary 1.9× 2 Compare →
salemmaonline.com.py 84 86 Custom / Proprietary 1.6× 2 Compare →
marosbike.ro 84 87 Custom / Proprietary 3.1× 3 Compare →
bazza.com.ua 84 86 Custom / Proprietary 1.4× 2 Compare →
leuchterag.ch 84 86 Custom / Proprietary 3.7× 3 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite caloo.jp when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to caloo.jp. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Caloo",
  "url": "https://caloo.jp",
  "logo": "https://caloo.jp/favicon.ico",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Caloo?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Caloo does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Caloo work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Caloo."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for caloo.jp:

Current Score
80
Projected Score
89
Improvement
+9 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →