bird-in-hand.co.uk 76 B
🛡️ SEO 75 🤖 GEO 92 ⚡ Perf 33 🏗️ Arch 93

bird-in-hand.co.uk — Global SEODiff Score 76/100

bird-in-hand.co.uk
📊

Among all indexed domains, bird-in-hand.co.uk ranks in the top echelon with an ACRI of 90, demonstrating that its content is highly visible to AI systems. Content is delivered server-side, meaning bots and AI agents can parse the full page without executing JavaScript. A tight 1.7× token bloat ratio reflects disciplined markup: minimal noise between the crawler and the content it needs. Only 1 schema block is present — adding Organization, WebSite, and Breadcrumb schemas would significantly improve structured data coverage. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

76
B — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (33) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Monitor weekly to catch regressions early
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 25, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than bird-in-hand.co.uk?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)75 × 0.25 = 18.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)92 × 0.40 = 36.8
⚡ Performance (20% weight)33 × 0.20 = 6.6
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)93 × 0.15 = 13.9
Weighted sum = 18.8 + 36.8 + 6.6 + 13.9
Global SEODiff Score = 76 (B)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
100
Structure
avg 35
42
Schema
avg 10
85
Tech Stack
avg 64
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 43%
Rank #429082
-41 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 1%
Score 90/100

bird-in-hand.co.uk ranks much higher on Google (Tranco Top 43%) than in AI search (Top 1%). This is the 'Invisible Giant' pattern — implement the patches above to close the AI gap. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why bird-in-hand.co.uk ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
Industry
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat1.7×

Fastest improvements

  • You’re already in decent shape — the next moat is monitoring drift over time.
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

75/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

49 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

106 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 1
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://bird-in-hand.co.uk/en-gb/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — OnlyFans Finder – Explore Top OnlyFans Creators
  • ✓ og:description — Discover top OnlyFans creators: free content, VIP accounts, and easy category search – all in one place.
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

92/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 100/100 — Excellent
Structured Elements 1258 elements (1258 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words2133
Raw Density59.0%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

3/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

86
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability86/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (50/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

58%
🗑️ 42%
Useful Content (144.0 KB)Bloat (105.1 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio1.7× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context100% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage31 / 31 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

82 Entropy
Good Token Bloat: Low
Noise Ratio: 42.2% · SNR: 1.37 · Signal: 36856 / Noise: 26897 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

A local LLM (mlx-community/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-4bit) analyzed the extracted content of bird-in-hand.co.uk and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Search and discover top OnlyFans creators
Target Audience
People interested in OnlyFans content
Pricing Model
Free content, paid VIP accounts
Model: mlx-community/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-4bit · Analyzed: 2026-02-25 · Data extracted from the site’s main content via strict JSON prompting.

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time1830 ms
Raw HTML Size249.0 KB
Visible Text Size144.0 KB

Performance & Speed

33/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1830 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

3033
DOM nodes
249 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✓ CDN cache status → DYNAMIC
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

93/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://bird-in-hand.co.uk/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

1300
internal links
0
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

✓ TOP 15% AI-READY

🏆 You Are AI-Verified — Claim Your Badge

Your site scores 87/100 on the AI-Crawler Reality Index. Embed this trust badge on your site — every click sends visitors to your verified report and builds backlinks to your domain.

AI-Verified badge for bird-in-hand.co.uk
Verified — updates automatically every 24h
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/bird-in-hand.co.uk" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=bird-in-hand.co.uk" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

How it works: The badge queries your ACRI score daily. If your score drops below 80 or your site hasn't been scanned in 30 days, the badge changes to "Pending Audit" (yellow) — prompting you to fix issues and rescan. Learn about ACRI methodology →

🔗 Similar Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to bird-in-hand.co.uk. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
bird-in-hand.co.uk (this site) 87 90 WordPress 1.7× 1
hope-inns.com 86 90 WordPress 1.7× 1 Compare →
schafe-schuesse.de 86 90 WordPress 1.9× 1 Compare →
travelsafe-abroad.com 85 90 WordPress 1.7× 1 Compare →
5soldiers.co.uk 85 90 WordPress 1.8× 1 Compare →
sbba.or.jp 85 90 WordPress 2.1× 1 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to bird-in-hand.co.uk. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Co?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Co does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Co work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Co."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for bird-in-hand.co.uk:

Current Score
90
Projected Score
93
Improvement
+3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history