bettingsites.ltd.uk 74 B
🛡️ SEO 84 🤖 GEO 82 ⚡ Perf 41 🏗️ Arch 82

bettingsites.ltd.uk — Global SEODiff Score 74/100

bettingsites.ltd.uk
📊

The AI-Readiness profile for bettingsites.ltd.uk is strong: an ACRI of 76/100 places it ahead of 83% of domains in the index. Content is delivered server-side, meaning bots and AI agents can parse the full page without executing JavaScript. With a 2.1× bloat ratio, the page delivers its content without excessive boilerplate, giving AI systems a clean extraction path. The presence of 4 structured data blocks ensures search engines and AI agents can accurately classify and extract entities from the page. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

74
B — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (41) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add HSTS header → +2 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 21, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 7 snapshots
Feb 24 Mar 21
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
🔄 Mar 21 Content change detected
🔄 Mar 18 Content change detected
🔄 Mar 13 Content change detected
Does your site score higher than bettingsites.ltd.uk?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)84 × 0.25 = 21.0
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)82 × 0.40 = 32.8
⚡ Performance (20% weight)41 × 0.20 = 8.2
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)82 × 0.15 = 12.3
Weighted sum = 21.0 + 32.8 + 8.2 + 12.3
Global SEODiff Score = 74 (B)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
46
Structure
avg 35
48
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 47%
Rank #470804
-30 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 17%
Score 76/100

bettingsites.ltd.uk ranks much higher on Google (Tranco Top 47%) than in AI search (Top 17%). This is the 'Visibility Gap' pattern — implementing the recommendations above can help close the AI gap. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why bettingsites.ltd.uk ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
Industry
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage4 blocks
Token bloat2.1×

Fastest improvements

  • You’re already in decent shape — the next moat is monitoring drift over time.
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

84/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

57 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

113 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 16
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://bettingsites.co.uk/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Betting Sites UK | Compare the Best Bookmakers March 2026
  • ✓ og:description — Best new betting sites UK 2026 – 70+ licensed bookmakers, daily updated bonuses & reviews at BettingSites.co.uk
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

82/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 46/100 — Fair
Structured Elements 652 elements (565 lists, 81 rows, 6 headers)
Total Words10343
Raw Density6.3%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks4 blocks

Schema Coverage Map

4/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
✅ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

71
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability71/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (50/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

47%
🗑️ 53%
Useful Content (176.7 KB)Bloat (194.9 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio2.1× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context92% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage349 / 380 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

73 Entropy
Good Token Bloat: Low
Noise Ratio: 52.5% · SNR: 0.91 · Signal: 45228 / Noise: 49898 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of bettingsites.ltd.uk and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
BettingSites.co.uk provides a platform for users to discover and compare betting sites, bonuses, and promotions in the UK.
Target Audience
Betting enthusiasts, novice and experienced bettors, users seeking betting information and offers.
Pricing Model
⚠ SEMANTIC VOID
🏆 Competitive Moat
Comprehensive betting site and promotion database with expert reviews and unbiased information.
📊 Content Depth
6/10
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Thin landing pages for features
• Lack of structured data for offers
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-22

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
ServerLiteSpeed
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time855 ms
Raw HTML Size371.6 KB
Visible Text Size176.7 KB

Performance & Speed

41/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

855 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

5052
DOM nodes
372 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

82/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://bettingsites.co.uk/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

513
internal links
101
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 73/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for bettingsites.ltd.uk
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/bettingsites.ltd.uk" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=bettingsites.ltd.uk" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
73
Single-page score
+11
Subpages outperform homepage
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
84
Avg across 10 pages · Range 50–90
Topical Cohesion
6%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
78979
Avg Bloat
14.5×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://bettingsites.ltd.uk/pricing
Betting Sites UK | Compare the Best Bookmakers February 2026
pricing 90 7.7× 9805 💰 Pricing
https://bettingsites.ltd.uk/products
Betting Sites UK | Compare the Best Bookmakers February 2026
pricing 90 7.7× 9810 💰 Pricing
https://bettingsites.ltd.uk/features
Betting Sites UK | Compare the Best Bookmakers February 2026
pricing 90 7.7× 9804 💰 Pricing
https://bettingsites.ltd.uk/docs
Betting Sites UK | Compare the Best Bookmakers February 2026
pricing 90 7.7× 9810 💰 Pricing
https://bettingsites.ltd.uk/blog
Betting Sites UK | Compare the Best Bookmakers February 2026
pricing 90 7.7× 9801 💰 Pricing
https://bettingsites.ltd.uk/case-studies
Betting Sites UK | Compare the Best Bookmakers February 2026
pricing 90 7.7× 9824 💰 Pricing
https://bettingsites.ltd.uk/integrations
Betting Sites UK | Compare the Best Bookmakers February 2026
pricing 90 7.7× 9806 💰 Pricing
https://bettingsites.ltd.uk/faq
Betting Sites UK | Compare the Best Bookmakers February 2026
pricing 90 7.7× 9802 💰 Pricing
https://bettingsites.ltd.uk/about
BettingSites.co.uk - About
pricing 75 8.8× 466 💰 Pricing
https://bettingsites.ltd.uk/contact
BettingSites.co.uk - Contact
pricing 50 74.5× 51 💰 Pricing
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/docs/ 1 90 0% 7.7× High JS Bloat
/pricing/ 1 90 0% 7.7× High JS Bloat
/faq/ 1 90 0% 7.7× High JS Bloat
/blog/ 1 90 0% 7.7× High JS Bloat
/features/ 1 90 0% 7.7× High JS Bloat
/case-studies/ 1 90 0% 7.7× High JS Bloat
/integrations/ 1 90 0% 7.7× High JS Bloat
/products/ 1 90 0% 7.7× High JS Bloat
/about/ 1 75 0% 8.8× High JS Bloat
/contact/ 1 50 0% 74.5× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 10 pages
gamcare.org.uk ×10
gamstop.co.uk ×10
gambleaware.org ×10
bettingsites.co.uk ×8
gamblingcommission.gov.uk ×8
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/bettingsites.ltd.uk

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to bettingsites.ltd.uk. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
bettingsites.ltd.uk (this site) 73 76 Custom / Proprietary 2.1× 4
patilanci.bg 83 85 Custom / Proprietary 1.9× 4 Compare →
workport.co.jp 83 87 Custom / Proprietary 3.2× 3 Compare →
conselho.saude.gov.br 83 86 Custom / Proprietary 2.4× 2 Compare →
tradeindata.com 83 91 Custom / Proprietary 2.0× 1 Compare →
westminster-abbey.org 83 82 Cloudflare Pages 1.8× 4 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite bettingsites.ltd.uk when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to bettingsites.ltd.uk. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Ltd?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Ltd does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Ltd work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Ltd."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for bettingsites.ltd.uk:

Current Score
76
Projected Score
79
Improvement
+3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →