arin.net 74 B
🛡️ SEO 50 🤖 GEO 84 ⚡ Perf 68 🏗️ Arch 93

arin.net — Global SEODiff Score 74/100

arin.net
📊

At 79/100, the ACRI for arin.net indicates strong fundamentals in AI extractability, surpassing the majority of indexed sites. In the social sector, arin.net outperforms the average (58), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. The low ghost ratio (0%) confirms that what crawlers see matches what users see — a hallmark of strong SSR implementation. The token bloat ratio sits at a lean 2.9×, meaning the ratio of code to visible content is efficient — crawlers spend their token budget on actual information. No structured data was detected, which means AI systems must infer all entities and relationships from raw HTML alone. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

74
B — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Traditional SEO (50) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add Organization + WebSite JSON-LD → +5–8 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 26, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 3 snapshots
Feb 23 Feb 26
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than arin.net?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)50 × 0.25 = 12.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)84 × 0.40 = 33.6
⚡ Performance (20% weight)68 × 0.20 = 13.6
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)93 × 0.15 = 13.9
Weighted sum = 12.5 + 33.6 + 13.6 + 13.9
Global SEODiff Score = 74 (B)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
76
Structure
avg 36
0
Schema
avg 9
90
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 0.3%
Rank #3338
+9 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 9%
Score 79/100

arin.net shows stronger AI visibility than traditional SEO ranking. Great AI foundation to build on. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why arin.net ranks here

Tech stackHugo
Industrysocial
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage0 blocks
Token bloat2.9×

Fastest improvements

  • Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

50/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

38 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

139 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 3
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.arin.net/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-us
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — American Registry for Internet Numbers
  • ✓ og:description — ARIN is a nonprofit, member-based organization that administers IP addresses & ASNs in support of the operation and growth of the Internet.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

84/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the social sector, plodopitomnik-sad.by (ACRI: 89) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
arin.net
65
Your ACRI Score
89
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. plodopitomnik-sad.by has schema coverage of 11 blocks and uses Express. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 76/100 — Good
Structured Elements 121 elements (113 lists, 5 rows, 3 headers)
Total Words702
Raw Density17.2%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks0 — No JSON-LD detected

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

68
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability68/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (10/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

34%
🗑️ 66%
Useful Content (10.1 KB)Bloat (18.7 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio2.9× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context100% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage10 / 10 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

52 Entropy
Fair Token Bloat: Medium
Noise Ratio: 65.1% · SNR: 0.54 · Signal: 2573 / Noise: 4798 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

A local LLM (mlx-community/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-4bit) analyzed the extracted content of arin.net and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Regulate and manage IP address policies for internet service providers and registries
Target Audience
ARIN Advisory Council members, policy drafters, internet service providers
Pricing Model
⚠ SEMANTIC VOID
🏆 Competitive Moat
Expertise in IP address management and policy creation
📊 Content Depth
3/10
⚡ Key Pain Points
• No structured FAQ schema
• Thin landing pages for features
Model: mlx-community/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-4bit · Analyzed: 2026-02-28 · Data extracted from the site’s main content via strict JSON prompting.

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkHugo
AI-Readiness Score90/100
Servernginx
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1015 ms
Raw HTML Size28.8 KB
Visible Text Size10.1 KB

Performance & Speed

68/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1015 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

517
DOM nodes
29 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

93/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.arin.net/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

135
internal links
7
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-us
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 65/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for arin.net
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/arin.net" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=arin.net" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 1001 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
65
Single-page score
+1
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
66
Avg across 1001 pages · Range 26–87
Topical Cohesion
9%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
1300573
Avg Bloat
16.0×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.arin.net/participate/meetings/ARIN56/day1_transcript/
ARIN 56 Public Policy and Members Meeting, Day 1 Transcript - Thursday, 30 October 2025 - American Registry for Internet Numbers
pricing 87 1.4× 52933 💰 Pricing
https://www.arin.net/participate/meetings/ARIN56/day2_transcript/
ARIN 56 Public Policy and Members Meeting, Day 2 Transcript - Friday, 31 October 2025 - American Registry for Internet Numbers
pricing 87 1.4× 23837 💰 Pricing
https://www.arin.net/reference/research/whowas/tou/
WhoWas Terms of Use - American Registry for Internet Numbers
docs 82 3.3× 2429
https://www.arin.net/resources/registry/whois/rws/api/
Whois-RWS API Documentation - American Registry for Internet Numbers
pricing 82 3.0× 5458 💰 Pricing
https://www.arin.net/reference/research/whowas/readme/
WhoWas ReadMe - American Registry for Internet Numbers
docs 82 4.5× 1914
https://www.arin.net/reference/materials/software/
ARIN Software Releases - American Registry for Internet Numbers
pricing 82 3.5× 3431 💰 Pricing
https://www.arin.net/reference/materials/data/
Registry Data Description - American Registry for Internet Numbers
docs 82 3.6× 2614
https://www.arin.net/reference/research/bulkwhois/
Bulk Whois Data - American Registry for Internet Numbers
docs 82 4.3× 1771
https://www.arin.net/blog/2019/04/03/microsoft-works-toward-ipv6-only-single-stack-network/
Microsoft Works Toward IPv6-only Single Stack Network - American Registry for Internet Numbers
pricing 82 3.2× 3230 💰 Pricing
https://www.arin.net/blog/2019/06/12/practical-steps-to-accelerate-ipv6-adoption/
Practical Steps to Accelerate IPv6 Adoption - American Registry for Internet Numbers
pricing 82 4.9× 1780 💰 Pricing
https://www.arin.net/blog/2019/07/22/testament-to-the-adaptability-of-the-internet/
Testament to the Adaptability of the Internet - American Registry for Internet Numbers
pricing 82 4.1× 2169 💰 Pricing
https://www.arin.net/blog/2019/05/02/economic-factors-affecting-ipv6-deployment/
Economic Factors Affecting IPv6 Deployment - American Registry for Internet Numbers
pricing 82 4.4× 2137 💰 Pricing
https://www.arin.net/blog/2019/09/11/arin-bits-september-2019/
ARIN Bits: September 2019 - American Registry for Internet Numbers
pricing 82 4.4× 2317 💰 Pricing
https://www.arin.net/blog/2020/10/02/sprints-journey-through-ipv6-transition-mechanisms/
Running the Gamut: Legacy Sprint's Journey Through IPv6 Transition Mechanisms - American Registry for Internet Numbers
pricing 82 4.5× 2055 💰 Pricing
https://www.arin.net/blog/2021/05/18/rrdp-implementation-report-for-openbsd-rpki-client/
RRDP Implementation Report for OpenBSD rpki-client - American Registry for Internet Numbers
pricing 82 4.0× 2591 💰 Pricing
https://www.arin.net/blog/2022/05/17/international-digital-standards-involvement-actors-arin-service-region/
International Digital Standards: A Case for the Involvement of Actors in the ARIN Service Region - American Registry for Internet Numbers
pricing 82 5.0× 1914 💰 Pricing
https://www.arin.net/blog/2022/05/03/arin-49-ipv6-panel/
Why Doesn’t the Internet Migrate Entirely to IPv6? - American Registry for Internet Numbers
pricing 82 3.7× 2607 💰 Pricing
https://www.arin.net/blog/2021/06/16/arin-bits-june-2021/
ARIN Bits: June 2021 - American Registry for Internet Numbers
pricing 82 5.0× 1813 💰 Pricing
https://www.arin.net/blog/2024/05/21/arin53-keynote-recap/
Building and Sustaining Caribbean Digital Infrastructure with IXPs and IPv6 Technologies - American Registry for Internet Numbers
pricing 82 3.8× 2620 💰 Pricing
https://www.arin.net/blog/2024/03/28/arin-bits-march-2024/
ARIN Bits: March 2024 - American Registry for Internet Numbers
pricing 82 4.4× 2565 💰 Pricing
Showing 20 of 100 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/blog/ 299 78 0% 7.1× High JS Bloat
/about/ 90 80 0% 4.7× Healthy
/resources/ 62 78 0% 6.2× High JS Bloat
/participate/ 24 79 0% 6.7× High JS Bloat
/reference/ 15 79 0% 6.8× High JS Bloat
/announcements/ 6 77 0% 7.9× High JS Bloat
/contact/ 3 79 0% 6.1× High JS Bloat
/events/ 1 77 0% 9.1× High JS Bloat
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/arin.net

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar social Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to arin.net. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
arin.net (this site) 65 79 Hugo 2.9× 0
dailytrib.com 81 89 WordPress 3.6× 1 Compare →
cleopatraceramics.com 81 90 WordPress 3.6× 1 Compare →
zeus02.angkakeramatjitu.com 81 87 WordPress 1.5× 1 Compare →
prediksi02.prediksikpk100.com 81 87 WordPress 1.4× 1 Compare →
tokyoapartment.fpage.biz 81 84 WordPress 1.4× 1 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
👻

Rendering Drop-Off by Depth

DEPTH PENALTY 1001 PAGES
0%
Homepage Ghost
0%
Deep Pages Avg Ghost
1%
Homepage Bloat
16%
Deep Pages Avg Bloat
Ghost Ratio by Crawl Depth
Depth 0
0%
1 pg · ACRI 87
Orphan
0%
1000 pg · ACRI 66
⚠️ Worst Rendering Pages
0% https://www.arin.net/events/TORNOG1/ orphan
0% https://www.arin.net/events/RIPE91/ orphan
0% https://www.arin.net/events/IETF124/ orphan
0% https://www.arin.net/events/ICANN85/ orphan
0% https://www.arin.net/events/LACNIC45/ orphan
Deeper pages lose rendering fidelity. Pages at depth 4+ often show 2-3× higher ghost ratios than the homepage, meaning AI crawlers see progressively less of your actual content as they navigate deeper into the site architecture.
🏗️

Deep Architecture Health & Equity Distribution

1001 PAGES
84.9%
Gini Inequality [?]
Extreme hoarding
85%
Top-3 PR Share [?]
Equity held by 3 pages
1000
Orphan Pages [?]
99.9% of site
0.0
Avg Click Depth [?]
Max: 0 clicks
0
Internal Links
1000 disconnected
18%
Semantic Cohesion [?]
Topical Drift
0% Healthy (receive equity)
0% Diluted hubs (>50 outbound)
100% Orphans (zero inbound)
🔗 Top Hub Pages (Highest PageRank)
https://www.arin.net/participate/meetings/ARIN56/day2_transcript/ https://www.arin.net/participate/meetings/ARIN56/day1_transcript/ https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/pdp/ https://www.arin.net/participate/oversight/elections/processes/questionnaires/ https://www.arin.net/participate/oversight/elections/processes/
⚠️
1000 orphan pages receive zero internal link equity. A Gini coefficient of 0.85 means the top 3 pages hoard 85% of all internal PageRank — AI crawlers may never discover the rest.
💡 Quick Win: Optimal Link Injection
To rescue the orphan page day1 transcript, add a link to it from your high-authority Hub Page day2 transcript. (Semantic Match: 72%)
📥 Orphan: https://www.arin.net/participate/meetings/ARIN56/day1_transcript/
🔗 Donor: https://www.arin.net/participate/meetings/ARIN56/day2_transcript/ (PR: 0.8501)
Get the full link injection plan for all 1000 orphan pages
Unlock Full Link Strategy →
The Gini coefficient measures link equity inequality across your site. A Gini of 0.85 indicates severe equity hoarding — a handful of pages dominate PageRank while hundreds starve. AI crawlers penalize this by ignoring deep pages.
🗂️

Topical Authority Distribution

10 TOPICS

How this domain's content is distributed across topic areas — derived from TF-IDF analysis of 1001 crawled pages.

hardware, programs, under
57 4 pgs (17%)
listed, see, current
52 3 pgs (13%)
standing, look, streamlined
67 2 pgs (9%)
autonomous, united, advances
42 2 pgs (9%)
main, service, directly
77 2 pgs (9%)
establish, content, accordance
77 2 pgs (9%)
location, brief, stakeholders
42 2 pgs (9%)
information, who, submit
52 2 pgs (9%)
this, october, sessions
77 2 pgs (9%)
addresses, members, always
77 2 pgs (9%)
Topical Authority shows how your content is concentrated. High concentration in few topics may limit long-tail search coverage; extreme fragmentation dilutes your authority signal.
🧲

Semantic Density

STRONG 759 TOPICS
759
Topic Clusters
via TF-IDF cosine, ε=.60
24
High-Density Pairs
>92% cosine similarity
Strong
Contextual Depth
>20 pairs
Reinforcing Content Clusters
🟢 standing, look, streamlined 100% avg similarity · ACRI 67–67
  • https://arin.net/blog
  • https://www.arin.net/blog/
🟢 autonomous, united, advances 100% avg similarity · ACRI 42–42
  • https://arin.net/about
  • https://www.arin.net/about/
🟢 main, service, directly 100% avg similarity · ACRI 77–77
  • https://www.arin.net/contact/
  • https://arin.net/contact
🟢 establish, content, accordance 99% avg similarity · ACRI 77–77
  • https://www.arin.net/resources/fees/fee_schedule/2025_fee_schedule/
  • https://www.arin.net/resources/fees/fee_schedule/2024_fee_schedule/
🟢 location, brief, stakeholders 99% avg similarity · ACRI 42–42
  • https://www.arin.net/events/CTUQ1-26/
  • https://www.arin.net/events/CTUQ2-26/
🟢 hardware, programs, under 99% avg similarity · ACRI 57–57
  • https://www.arin.net/about/corporate/planning/budgets/budget2021/
  • https://www.arin.net/about/corporate/planning/budgets/budget2023/
  • https://www.arin.net/about/corporate/planning/budgets/budget2024/
  • https://www.arin.net/about/corporate/planning/budgets/budget2022/
🟢 information, who, submit 98% avg similarity · ACRI 52–52
  • https://www.arin.net/resources/registry/reassignments/ostp/
  • https://www.arin.net/resources/registry/ostp/
🟢 listed, see, current 98% avg similarity · ACRI 52–52
  • https://www.arin.net/announcements/20250702-ipv4/
  • https://www.arin.net/announcements/20251013/
  • https://www.arin.net/announcements/20260114/
🟢 this, october, sessions 96% avg similarity · ACRI 77–77
  • https://www.arin.net/blog/2025/07/15/arin-56-fellowship-applications/
  • https://www.arin.net/blog/2026/01/12/arin-57-fellowship-applications/
🟢 addresses, members, always 96% avg similarity · ACRI 77–77
  • https://www.arin.net/blog/2021/04/07/get-to-know-the-draft-policies-under-discussion-at-arin-47/
  • https://www.arin.net/blog/2020/10/08/get-to-know-the-draft-policies-under-discussion-at-arin-46/
Semantic Density measures how deeply your site covers each topic. High-density clusters (>92% similarity) mean multiple pages reinforce the same subject — this is positive for RAG/AI systems that need corroborating sources. Thin coverage (few clusters) means AI models have less evidence to cite you.
Get a full content consolidation plan for all 24 high-density pairs
Unlock Consolidation Plan →
🧬

Entity Knowledge Gap Analysis

14 MISSING 0% COVERAGE
🚨
Missing Core Entity — Critical
arin.net has zero JSON-LD entities declared. AI models cannot identify your brand, product, or organization in their knowledge graph. This means:
  • AI search engines will not attribute content to your brand
  • No rich snippets or knowledge panels will be generated
  • Competitor entities will fill the gap in AI responses
Fix: Add Organization or Brand JSON-LD to your homepage.
⚠️ 14 entities mentioned in content but missing from structured data:
Go Rust REST SSO AWS SOC 2 Bootstrap PCI DSS Segment Fastly Java Cloudflare React GitHub
Each missing entity is a lost opportunity for rich snippet inclusion and AI knowledge graph integration.
Schema Coverage: 0 declared vs 26 extracted — 0% coverage Entities with <100% coverage create knowledge graph blind spots for AI systems
🧭

Semantic Nearest Neighbors

View all →
ask.com
SEMANTIC VOID
38%
Overlap
48
ACRI
Compare
autism.org.uk
Provides information on autism and communication differences, including support strategies and insights from autistic people.
33%
Overlap
76
ACRI
Compare
24%
Overlap
46
ACRI
Compare
View All Semantic Alternatives → 📚 Docs Quality Index →
🎭

Bait & Switch Delta

A 15 PAGES

Compares your homepage rendering quality with inner pages. A high drift score means AI crawlers see a polished homepage but degraded inner content — the "bait & switch" that erodes trust.

42
Homepage ACRI
46
Inner Avg ACRI
-4
ACRI Delta
0%
Homepage Ghost
1%
Inner Avg Ghost
1
Drift Score [?]
Worst Inner Pages
29 20% docs https://www.arin.net/reference/tools/cidr/
42 0% docs https://www.arin.net/reference/
77 0% pricing https://arin.net/contact
🛡️

E-E-A-T Trust Signals

C 40/100

Trust indicators extracted from surface pages. These signals help AI systems verify your site's Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness.

Physical Address
Phone Number
Email Contact
About Page
Contact Page
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Named Leadership
🔗

Citation Profile

18 DOMAINS

Outbound citation patterns across surface-crawled pages. Sites that cite diverse, authoritative sources signal higher E-E-A-T to AI systems.

116
Total Links
18
Unique Domains
7.7
Avg/Page
16%
Diversity
arin.statuspage.io instagram.com x.com youtube.com nro.net facebook.com linkedin.com account.arin.net ftp.arin.net ripe.net
🏘️ Outbound Neighborhood Trust Avg Trust: 46.8

AI trust scores for the domains arin.net links to. Citing high-trust sources lifts your own credibility signal.

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to arin.net. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Arin",
  "url": "https://arin.net",
  "logo": "https://arin.net/img/favicon.ico",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Arin",
  "url": "https://arin.net",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://arin.net/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Arin?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Arin does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Arin work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Arin."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for arin.net:

Current Score
79
Projected Score
92
Improvement
+13 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history