appier.net 65 C
🛡️ SEO 56 🤖 GEO 84 ⚡ Perf 34 🏗️ Arch 70

appier.net — Global SEODiff Score 65/100

appier.net
📊

With a solid 79/100 ACRI, appier.net is well-positioned for AI search — better than 91% of sites in the Radar. Within the ecommerce vertical, this places appier.net above the industry average of 58 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. The low ghost ratio (5%) confirms that what crawlers see matches what users see — a hallmark of strong SSR implementation. The token bloat ratio sits at a lean 2.7×, meaning the ratio of code to visible content is efficient — crawlers spend their token budget on actual information. Minimal structured data (1 block) limits the site's ability to communicate entity relationships to AI systems. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

65
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (34) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Monitor weekly to catch regressions early
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 26, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than appier.net?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)56 × 0.25 = 14.0
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)84 × 0.40 = 33.6
⚡ Performance (20% weight)34 × 0.20 = 6.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)70 × 0.15 = 10.5
Weighted sum = 14.0 + 33.6 + 6.8 + 10.5
Global SEODiff Score = 65 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
66
Structure
avg 36
42
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 0.2%
Rank #2001
+9 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 9%
Score 79/100

appier.net shows stronger AI visibility than traditional SEO ranking. Great AI foundation to build on. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why appier.net ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
Industryecommerce
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat2.7×

Fastest improvements

  • You’re already in decent shape — the next moat is monitoring drift over time.
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

56/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

50 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

107 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 2
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 5
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.appier.com/en/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Appier | Empowering Businesses to Turn AI into ROI
  • ✓ og:description — Comprehensive AI-Powered Solutions: Smoother Operations. Elevated Customer Experience. Better Performance.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

84/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the ecommerce sector, plantes-avenue.fr (ACRI: 88) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
appier.net
67
Your ACRI Score
88
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. plantes-avenue.fr has schema coverage of 12 blocks and uses PrestaShop. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 66/100 — Good
Structured Elements 189 elements (189 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1436
Raw Density13.2%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

1/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

75
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability75/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

37%
🗑️ 63%
Useful Content (58.1 KB)Bloat (96.2 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio2.7× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context64% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage51 / 80 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

57 Entropy
Fair Token Bloat: Medium
Noise Ratio: 62.4% · SNR: 0.60 · Signal: 14862 / Noise: 24634 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time2138 ms
Raw HTML Size154.3 KB
Visible Text Size58.1 KB

Performance & Speed

34/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

2138 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1120
DOM nodes
154 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → s-maxage=36000, max-age=5
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

70/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

6
internal links
162
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 67/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for appier.net
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/appier.net" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=appier.net" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 16 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
67
Single-page score
0
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
67
Avg across 16 pages · Range 67–67
Total Words
17088
Avg Bloat
29.6×
Ext. Citations
10
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://appier.net/api
Appier | Empowering Businesses to Turn AI into ROI
docs 67 29.6× 1068
https://appier.net/pricing
Appier | Empowering Businesses to Turn AI into ROI
pricing 67 29.6× 1068
https://appier.net/help
Appier | Empowering Businesses to Turn AI into ROI
support 67 29.6× 1068
https://appier.net/about
Appier | Empowering Businesses to Turn AI into ROI
about 67 29.6× 1068
https://appier.net/features
Appier | Empowering Businesses to Turn AI into ROI
product 67 29.6× 1068
https://appier.net/products
Appier | Empowering Businesses to Turn AI into ROI
product 67 29.6× 1068
https://appier.net/solutions
Appier | Empowering Businesses to Turn AI into ROI
product 67 29.6× 1068
https://appier.net/docs
Appier | Empowering Businesses to Turn AI into ROI
docs 67 29.6× 1068
https://appier.net/blog
Appier | Empowering Businesses to Turn AI into ROI
blog 67 29.6× 1068
https://appier.net/case-studies
Appier | Empowering Businesses to Turn AI into ROI
social-proof 67 29.6× 1068
https://appier.net/contact
Appier | Empowering Businesses to Turn AI into ROI
support 67 29.6× 1068
https://appier.net/integrations
Appier | Empowering Businesses to Turn AI into ROI
integrations 67 29.6× 1068
https://appier.net/faq
Appier | Empowering Businesses to Turn AI into ROI
support 67 29.6× 1068
https://appier.net/careers
Appier | Empowering Businesses to Turn AI into ROI
careers 67 29.6× 1068
https://appier.net/terms
Appier | Empowering Businesses to Turn AI into ROI
legal 67 29.6× 1068
https://appier.net/privacy
Appier | Empowering Businesses to Turn AI into ROI
legal 67 29.6× 1068
🔗
Outbound External Citations
10 unique external domains cited across 16 pages
apac-insider.com ×16
gartner.com ×16
youtube.com ×16
twitter.com ×16
facebook.com ×16
linkedin.com ×16
tagtoday.net ×16
blog.naver.com ×16
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/appier.net

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar ecommerce Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to appier.net. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
appier.net (this site) 67 79 Custom / Proprietary 2.7× 1
nev-dama.cz 67 77 Custom / Proprietary 2.7× 1 Compare →
appier.com 67 79 Custom / Proprietary 2.7× 1 Compare →
qgraph.io 67 79 Custom / Proprietary 2.7× 1 Compare →
costa-adeje.costasur.com 67 79 Custom / Proprietary 2.8× 1 Compare →
malaga.costasur.com 67 79 Custom / Proprietary 2.8× 1 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
🎭

Bait & Switch Delta

A 15 PAGES

Compares your homepage rendering quality with inner pages. A high drift score means AI crawlers see a polished homepage but degraded inner content — the "bait & switch" that erodes trust.

67
Homepage ACRI
67
Inner Avg ACRI
0
ACRI Delta
20%
Homepage Ghost
20%
Inner Avg Ghost
0
Drift Score
Worst Inner Pages
67 20% about https://appier.net/about
67 20% product https://appier.net/features
67 20% product https://appier.net/products
🛡️

E-E-A-T Trust Signals

C 40/100

Trust indicators extracted from surface pages. These signals help AI systems verify your site's Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness.

Physical Address
Phone Number
Email Contact
About Page
Contact Page
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Named Leadership
🔗

Citation Profile

10 DOMAINS

Outbound citation patterns across surface-crawled pages. Sites that cite diverse, authoritative sources signal higher E-E-A-T to AI systems.

150
Total Links
10
Unique Domains
10.0
Avg/Page
7%
Diversity
lp.singular.net tagtoday.net gartner.com appier.com linkedin.com youtube.com twitter.com facebook.com blog.naver.com apac-insider.com
🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to appier.net. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Appier",
  "url": "https://appier.net",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://appier.net/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Appier?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Appier does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Appier work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Appier."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for appier.net:

Current Score
79
Projected Score
86
Improvement
+7 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history