aossms.com 72 B
🛡️ SEO 72 🤖 GEO 88 ⚡ Perf 39 🏗️ Arch 76
Radar → Domains → aossms.com

aossms.com — Global SEODiff Score 72/100

aossms.com
📊

With a solid 83/100 ACRI, aossms.com is well-positioned for AI search — better than 97% of sites in the Radar. The low ghost ratio (0%) confirms that what crawlers see matches what users see — a hallmark of strong SSR implementation. A tight 3.3× token bloat ratio reflects disciplined markup: minimal noise between the crawler and the content it needs. Structured data coverage is solid at 2 blocks, covering core entities — expanding to include FAQ or Breadcrumb schemas could strengthen the profile further. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

72
B — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (39) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Fix title tag length → +3 pts
72
🛡️ Traditional SEO
88
🤖 AI Readiness
39
⚡ Performance
76
🏗️ Architecture
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 25, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than aossms.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)72 × 0.25 = 18.0
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)88 × 0.40 = 35.2
⚡ Performance (20% weight)39 × 0.20 = 7.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)76 × 0.15 = 11.4
Weighted sum = 18.0 + 35.2 + 7.8 + 11.4
Global SEODiff Score = 72 (B)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
65
Structure
avg 35
44
Schema
avg 10
85
Tech Stack
avg 64
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 45%
Rank #445277
-41 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 3%
Score 83/100

aossms.com ranks much higher on Google (Tranco Top 45%) than in AI search (Top 3%). This is the 'Invisible Giant' pattern — implement the patches above to close the AI gap. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why aossms.com ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
Industry—
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage2 blocks
Token bloat3.3×

Fastest improvements

  • You’re already in decent shape — the next moat is monitoring drift over time.
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
See other WordPress sites → Full leaderboard → Domain A–Z →
🛡️

Traditional SEO

72/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

160 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

269 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 22
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://aicross.co.jp/zettai-reach/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ja
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — 規模・業種を問わず7000社導入のSMS送信サービス | SMS送信サービス「絶対リーチ！SMS（ショートメッセージサービス）」
  • ✓ og:description — 絶対リーチ！SMSとはAI CROSS株式会社が提供するAPI連携可能なSMS送信サービスです。お客様へ届けたい情報を99%の高い到達率で確実に届けます。また双方向SMS相互のコミュケーションも可能になります。
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

88/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

✅
GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
✅
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
✅
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
✅
Google-Extended
Allowed
✅
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 65/100 — Good
Structured Elements 270 elements (254 lists, 6 rows, 10 headers)
Total Words2117
Raw Density12.8%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks2 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

4/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
✅ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

76
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability76/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (50/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

30%
🗑️ 70%
Useful Content (73.0 KB)Bloat (171.3 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio3.3× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context78% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage167 / 213 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

43 Entropy
Fair Token Bloat: Medium
Noise Ratio: 70.1% · SNR: 0.43 · Signal: 18698 / Noise: 43842 tokens
Run Full Entropy Audit →

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

A local LLM (mlx-community/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-4bit) analyzed the extracted content of aossms.com and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
SMS配信サービス：顧客とのコミュニケーションを確実に実現
Target Audience
規模・業種問わず、顧客とのコミュニケーションを必要とする企業
Pricing Model
初期費用なし、月額料金、メッセージ単価
🔗 Integration Partners
API
🛡️ Compliance Standards
ISMS認証プライバシーマークセキュアSMS認証の特許
Model: mlx-community/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-4bit · Analyzed: 2026-02-26 · Data extracted from the site’s main content via strict JSON prompting.

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
Servernginx
CDN—
HTTP Status200
Load Time1256 ms
Raw HTML Size244.3 KB
Visible Text Size73.0 KB
⚡

Performance & Speed

39/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1256 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

2184
DOM nodes
244 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → max-age=0, no-cache, no-store, must-revalidate
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

76/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

93
internal links
159
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ja
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 76/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for aossms.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold 
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/aossms.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=aossms.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
76
Single-page score
-6
Moderate hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
70
Avg across 10 pages · Range 70–70
Total Words
5840
Avg Bloat
85.7×
Ext. Citations
7
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://aossms.com/pricing
規模・業種を問わず7000社導入のSMS送信サービス | SMS送信サービス「絶対リーチ！SMS（ショートメッセージサービス）」
 pricing 70 85.7× 584 ✓
https://aossms.com/about
規模・業種を問わず7000社導入のSMS送信サービス | SMS送信サービス「絶対リーチ！SMS（ショートメッセージサービス）」
 about 70 85.7× 584 ✓
https://aossms.com/products
規模・業種を問わず7000社導入のSMS送信サービス | SMS送信サービス「絶対リーチ！SMS（ショートメッセージサービス）」
 product 70 85.7× 584 ✓
https://aossms.com/features
規模・業種を問わず7000社導入のSMS送信サービス | SMS送信サービス「絶対リーチ！SMS（ショートメッセージサービス）」
 product 70 85.7× 584 ✓
https://aossms.com/docs
規模・業種を問わず7000社導入のSMS送信サービス | SMS送信サービス「絶対リーチ！SMS（ショートメッセージサービス）」
 docs 70 85.7× 584 ✓
https://aossms.com/blog
規模・業種を問わず7000社導入のSMS送信サービス | SMS送信サービス「絶対リーチ！SMS（ショートメッセージサービス）」
 blog 70 85.7× 584 ✓
https://aossms.com/case-studies
規模・業種を問わず7000社導入のSMS送信サービス | SMS送信サービス「絶対リーチ！SMS（ショートメッセージサービス）」
 social-proof 70 85.7× 584 ✓
https://aossms.com/integrations
規模・業種を問わず7000社導入のSMS送信サービス | SMS送信サービス「絶対リーチ！SMS（ショートメッセージサービス）」
 integrations 70 85.7× 584 ✓
https://aossms.com/contact
規模・業種を問わず7000社導入のSMS送信サービス | SMS送信サービス「絶対リーチ！SMS（ショートメッセージサービス）」
 support 70 85.7× 584 ✓
https://aossms.com/faq
規模・業種を問わず7000社導入のSMS送信サービス | SMS送信サービス「絶対リーチ！SMS（ショートメッセージサービス）」
 support 70 85.7× 584 ✓
🔗
Outbound External Citations
7 unique external domains cited across 10 pages
aicross.co.jp ×10
it-trend.jp ×10
zettai-reach.com ×10
boxil.jp ×10
www2.aicross.co.jp ×10
facebook.com ×10
privacymark.jp ×10
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API. 

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/aossms.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to aossms.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
aossms.com (this site) 76 83 WordPress 3.3× 2 —
bythim.ru 76 86 WordPress 3.3× 2 Compare →
grantthornton.pl 76 85 WordPress 3.2× 2 Compare →
lnews.jp 76 84 WordPress 3.5× 2 Compare →
kyugetsu.com 76 84 WordPress 3.1× 2 Compare →
waveware.de 76 86 WordPress 3.1× 2 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

📄 Generate llms.txt 📊 Export JSON Data 📸 Download Visual

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking
Open My Site report → Open Self-Diffing incidents → Open History timeline →

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history

📚 Research & Documentation

🔬
The Science of ACRI
Methodology behind the AI-Crawler Reality Index scoring model.
🚨
Hallucination Risk Study
How poor crawl access increases AI fabrication rates by 3.5×.
🔥
Structural Entropy Paper
The median web page wastes 55% of tokens on noise. Here's the data.
🧪
Extraction Lab Paper
Causal evidence that semantic HTML structure increases AI extraction accuracy.
📖
Documentation Hub
Metrics definitions, fix guides, and API reference for CI/CD integration.
🛠️
Free Tools
llms.txt generator, hallucination checker, entropy audit, and more.