aanda.org 63 C
🛡️ SEO 50 🤖 GEO 79 ⚡ Perf 40 🏗️ Arch 72

aanda.org — Global SEODiff Score 63/100

aanda.org
📊

With a solid 69/100 ACRI, aanda.org is well-positioned for AI search — better than 65% of sites in the Radar. Within the social vertical, this places aanda.org above the industry average of 57 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Its server-rendered architecture ensures AI crawlers receive complete HTML on first request, a key advantage for extractability. The token bloat ratio sits at a lean 2.9×, meaning the ratio of code to visible content is efficient — crawlers spend their token budget on actual information. Zero schema blocks puts this site at a disadvantage in knowledge graph and AI-answer pipelines that rely on explicit structured data. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

63
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (40) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add Organization + WebSite JSON-LD → +5–8 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 5, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 4 snapshots
Feb 23 Mar 5
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than aanda.org?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)50 × 0.25 = 12.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)79 × 0.40 = 31.6
⚡ Performance (20% weight)40 × 0.20 = 8.0
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)72 × 0.15 = 10.8
Weighted sum = 12.5 + 31.6 + 8.0 + 10.8
Global SEODiff Score = 63 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
46
Structure
avg 36
0
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 4%
Rank #36674
+32 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 35%
Score 69/100

aanda.org punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why aanda.org ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
Industrysocial
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage0 blocks
Token bloat2.9×

Fastest improvements

  • Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

50/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

30 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

126 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 30
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✗ Canonical tag present
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-gb
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✗ og:title
  • ✗ og:description
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

79/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the social sector, plodopitomnik-sad.by (ACRI: 89) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
aanda.org
55
Your ACRI Score
89
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. plodopitomnik-sad.by has schema coverage of 11 blocks and uses Express. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 46/100 — Fair
Structured Elements 124 elements (109 lists, 15 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1980
Raw Density6.3%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks0 — No JSON-LD detected

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

59
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability59/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

34%
🗑️ 66%
Useful Content (30.2 KB)Bloat (58.6 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio2.9× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context32% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage9 / 28 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Only 32% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

52 Entropy
Fair Token Bloat: Medium
Noise Ratio: 65.9% · SNR: 0.52 · Signal: 7743 / Noise: 14991 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of aanda.org and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
This SaaS platform helps engineering teams visualize and manage their sprint capacity, enabling them to optimize resource allocation and improve
Target Audience
Engineering managers, product managers, scrum masters, and software development teams.
Pricing Model
Offers a free plan with limited features and paid tiers ranging from $12 to $30 per user per month, based on team size and desired functionality.
🔗 Integration Partners
SlackGitHubJira
🛡️ Compliance Standards
SOC 2GDPR
🏆 Competitive Moat
AI-powered sprint planning with real-time resource optimization and predictive capacity analysis, providing a significant advantage over traditional spreadsheet-based methods.
📊 Content Depth
8/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Integration directory pagesTemplate comparison pagesSprint planning guideResource allocation best practices
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Lack of automated capacity planning
• Difficulty in accurately estimating team velocity
• Manual spreadsheet-based sprint planning
• Poor visibility into team workload
• Inefficient resource allocation
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-02

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
Server
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time2922 ms
Raw HTML Size88.8 KB
Visible Text Size30.2 KB

Performance & Speed

40/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

2922 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1014
DOM nodes
89 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → max-age=86400
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

1
tracker scripts
1
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
googletagmanager.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

72/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.aanda.org/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

147
internal links
13
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-gb
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 55/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for aanda.org
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/aanda.org" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=aanda.org" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 85 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
55
Single-page score
0
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
56
Avg across 85 pages · Range 49–86
Topical Cohesion
3%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
1769765
Avg Bloat
17.0×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/ps/2007/06/aa6150-06.ps pricing 86 0.7× 492185 💰 Pricing
https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/ps/2007/06/aa0279-04e.ps blog 86 0.6× 71048
https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/ps/2007/06/aa5728-06.ps blog 86 0.7× 888857
https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/ps/2007/06/aa6354-06.ps pricing 81 3.6× 107339 💰 Pricing
https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/ps/2007/06/aa5892-06.ps pricing 80 1.5× 109566 💰 Pricing
https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/abs/2001/02/aah1988/aah1988.html
The IRAM key-project: Small-scale structure of pre-star forming regions - III. Influence of and correction for the error beam pick-up | Astronomy & Astrophysics (A&A)
pricing 67 18.1× 666 💰 Pricing
https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/ref/2001/02/aa9482/aa9482.html
Mid and Far IR properties of late-type galaxies in the Coma and A1367 clusters: ISOCAM and ISOPHOT observations | Astronomy & Astrophysics (A&A)
pricing 67 16.3× 1347 💰 Pricing
https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/ref/2001/03/aa9157/aa9157.html
ISO continuum observations of quasars at - I. Spectral energy distributions of quasars from the UV to far-infrared | Astronomy & Astrophysics (A&A)
pricing 67 16.8× 1238 💰 Pricing
https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/ps/2007/06/aa6284-06.ps pricing 66 13.8× 75838 💰 Pricing
https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/abs/2001/02/aa9482/aa9482.html
Mid and Far IR properties of late-type galaxies in the Coma and A1367 clusters: ISOCAM and ISOPHOT observations | Astronomy & Astrophysics (A&A)
pricing 62 21.1× 664 💰 Pricing
https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/ref/2001/02/aa10140/aa10140.html
Detection of arcs in Saturn's F ring during the 1995 Sun ring-plane crossing | Astronomy & Astrophysics (A&A)
pricing 62 24.8× 533 💰 Pricing
https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/ref/2001/02/aa10230/aa10230.html
Piston control with adaptive optics in stellar interferometry - Application to the GI2T interferometer and bimorph mirrors | Astronomy & Astrophysics (A&A)
pricing 62 20.6× 594 💰 Pricing
https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/abs/2001/03/aah2342/aah2342.html
BeppoSAX observations of Narrow-Line Seyfert 1 galaxies - II. Ionized iron features in Arakelian 564 | Astronomy & Astrophysics (A&A)
pricing 62 24.2× 506 💰 Pricing
https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/abs/2001/04/aa10231/aa10231.html
Jovicentric latitude effect on the bKOM radio emission observed by Ulysses/URAP | Astronomy & Astrophysics (A&A)
pricing 62 22.5× 503 💰 Pricing
https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/abs/2001/04/aah1835/aah1835.html
Infrared spectral classification of OB stars with ISO-SWS | Astronomy & Astrophysics (A&A)
pricing 62 22.0× 538 💰 Pricing
https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/ref/2001/04/aa10231/aa10231.html
Jovicentric latitude effect on the bKOM radio emission observed by Ulysses/URAP | Astronomy & Astrophysics (A&A)
pricing 62 21.2× 592 💰 Pricing
https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/ref/2001/04/aa10382/aa10382.html
On the history of the interplay between HD 56925and NGC 2359 | Astronomy & Astrophysics (A&A)
pricing 59 22.3× 669 💰 Pricing
https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/ref/2001/01/aaxmm08/aaxmm08.html
AGN in the XMM-Newton first-light image as probes for the interstellar medium in the LMC | Astronomy & Astrophysics (A&A)
pricing 59 25.3× 540 💰 Pricing
https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/abs/2001/03/aa9157/aa9157.html
ISO continuum observations of quasars at - I. Spectral energy distributions of quasars from the UV to far-infrared | Astronomy & Astrophysics (A&A)
pricing 59 27.3× 505 💰 Pricing
https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/ref/2001/03/aah2317/aah2317.html
Constraints on thick disc and halo parameters from HST photometry of field stars in the Galaxy | Astronomy & Astrophysics (A&A)
pricing 59 21.0× 809 💰 Pricing
Showing 20 of 85 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/articles/ 85 56 0% 17.0× High JS Bloat
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/aanda.org

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar social Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to aanda.org. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
aanda.org (this site) 55 69 Custom / Proprietary 2.9× 0
smaker.pl 80 86 Custom / Proprietary 3.9× 2 Compare →
planeta-shop.com.ua 80 86 Custom / Proprietary 4.1× 2 Compare →
wertpapier-forum.de 80 86 Custom / Proprietary 4.6× 2 Compare →
otoclubturkiye.com 80 87 Custom / Proprietary 4.7× 3 Compare →
bwcommunity.eu 80 87 Custom / Proprietary 4.9× 3 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite aanda.org when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to aanda.org. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Aanda",
  "url": "https://aanda.org",
  "logo": "https://aanda.org/templates/template1/images/aa/favicon.ico",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Aanda",
  "url": "https://aanda.org",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://aanda.org/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Aanda?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Aanda does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Aanda work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Aanda."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for aanda.org:

Current Score
69
Projected Score
82
Improvement
+13 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history