atlassian.com vs github.com
AI Readiness Head-to-Head Comparison
atlassian.com outperforms github.com in AI-Readiness, scoring 78/100 compared to 74/100 — a decisive 4-point lead. atlassian.com dominated in Content Structure, Schema Coverage, ACRI Score. However, github.com excelled in Rendering / Hydration, Tech Stack Quality. Token efficiency favors github.com at 38.3× vs atlassian.com's bloated 64.9×. See where your site stands — run a free AI-Readiness scan on SEODiff.
📊 Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | atlassian.com | github.com | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bot Access | 100 | 100 | TIE |
| Rendering / Hydration | 97 | 100WIN | github.com (+3) |
| Content Structure | 62WIN | 61 | atlassian.com (+1) |
| Schema Coverage | 42WIN | 0 | atlassian.com (+42) |
| Tech Stack Quality | 50 | 70WIN | github.com (+20) |
| ACRI Score | 56WIN | 53 | atlassian.com (+3) |
| Token Efficiency | 0 | 0 | TIE |
| Overall AI Readiness | 78/100 | 74/100 | 🏆 atlassian.com |
atlassian.com Details
Ghost Ratio10%
Token Bloat64.9×
Schema Count1
RenderingHybrid
GPTBot✅
ClaudeBot✅
ACRI GradeC
Tech StackCustom / Proprietary
github.com Details
Ghost Ratio0%
Token Bloat38.3×
Schema Count0
RenderingSSR
GPTBot✅
ClaudeBot✅
ACRI GradeD
Tech StackRuby on Rails
🏗️ Deep Architecture Comparison
Based on 1,000-page deep crawl analysis of each domain's internal architecture.
| Architecture Metric | atlassian.com | github.com |
|---|---|---|
| 🔗 Orphan Pages | 67 (98.5%) | 13 (92.9%) |
| 📏 Avg Click Depth | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 🧬 Entity Gap | 3 missing | 8 missing |
| 🎯 Semantic Cohesion | 23% | 10% |
| 📄 Pages Sampled | 68 | 14 |
📸 Share This Battle
Download a presentation-ready comparison image for social media or pitch decks.
🔍 How Does Your Site Compare?
See where your domain stands against atlassian.com and github.com.