AI Readiness Head-to-Head Comparison
apple.com outperforms apollo.io in AI-Readiness, scoring 76/100 compared to 75/100 — a decisive 1-point lead. apollo.io dominated in Tech Stack Quality. However, apple.com excelled in Content Structure, ACRI Score, Token Efficiency. Token efficiency favors apple.com at 5.4× vs apollo.io's bloated 48.2×. Wondering how your site compares? Run a free SEODiff scan to find out.
| Metric | apollo.io | apple.com | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bot Access | 100 | 100 | TIE |
| Rendering / Hydration | 99 | 99 | TIE |
| Content Structure | 32 | 49WIN | apple.com (+17) |
| Schema Coverage | 46 | 46 | TIE |
| Tech Stack Quality | 70WIN | 50 | apollo.io (+20) |
| ACRI Score | 56 | 62WIN | apple.com (+6) |
| Token Efficiency | 0 | 77WIN | apple.com (+77) |
| Overall AI Readiness | 75/100 | 76/100 | 🏆 apple.com |
Based on 1,000-page deep crawl analysis of each domain's internal architecture.
| Architecture Metric | apollo.io | apple.com |
|---|---|---|
| 🔗 Orphan Pages | 130 (99.2%) | 639 (99.8%) |
| 📏 Avg Click Depth | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 🧬 Entity Gap | 13 missing | 10 missing |
| 🎯 Semantic Cohesion | 17% | 14% |
| 📄 Pages Sampled | 131 | 640 |
Download a presentation-ready comparison image for social media or pitch decks.
See where your domain stands against apollo.io and apple.com.