AI Visibility Gap Identified

wikimedia.org ranks well in traditional search but shows low AI extractability. Here's the analysis — and practical steps to improve.

23
wikimedia.org
Grade F
mediawiki
VS
84
medi.de
Grade A
typo3

Assessment: AI Visibility Gap

wikimedia.org has strong traditional search presence but an ACRI of 23 suggests room for AI-readiness improvement vs medi.de (84 ACRI).

Risk Factor: 27x Token Bloat + JS Rendering Gap

📊 Evidence Dashboard

Evidence Score

61/100
Composite (retrieval 50% + hallucination 30% + bloat 10% + rank 10%)

Retrieval Mismatch

67%
2/3 queries returned a competitor instead

Hallucination Rate

62%
3/8 fields extracted correctly

Token Bloat

27x
HTML tokens per useful content token

🔍 Shadow RAG Probe Results

Each query was run against our FAISS-indexed corpus of 100,000+ domains. The table shows who the retrieval pipeline cited as the top answer.

QueryTypeTop RetrievedACRIResult
What is Wikimedia? entity wikimedia.org 23 ✓ Match
What features does Wikimedia offer? product medi.de 84 ⚠ Mismatch
best online platform for enterprise comparison medi.de 84 ⚠ Mismatch

🔧 Remediation Checklist for wikimedia.org

Prioritized technical fixes to reclaim AI citation share. Total estimated effort: 1–3 engineering sprints.

Is your domain at risk?

Run a free AI Visibility scan to check your ACRI score, token bloat, and hallucination risk.

View Full Domain Report →