threads.com ranks well in traditional search but shows low AI extractability. Here's the analysis — and practical steps to improve.
threads.com has strong traditional search presence but an ACRI of 19 suggests room for AI-readiness improvement vs agedcarefind.com.au (86 ACRI).
Each query was run against our FAISS-indexed corpus of 100,000+ domains. The table shows who the retrieval pipeline cited as the top answer.
| Query | Type | Top Retrieved | ACRI | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| What is Threads? | entity | agedcarefind.com.au | 86 | ⚠ Mismatch |
| What features does Threads offer? | product | agedcarefind.com.au | 86 | ⚠ Mismatch |
| best medical services for enterprise | comparison | agedcarefind.com.au | 86 | ⚠ Mismatch |
Prioritized technical fixes to reclaim AI citation share. Total estimated effort: 1–3 engineering sprints.
<!-- Add to <head> for AI crawlers: --> <link rel="alternate" type="application/ld+json" href="/structured-data.json"> <!-- Or serve a simplified HTML variant for bot user-agents -->
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "threads.com",
"url": "https://threads.com",
"description": "..."
}
</script>
# Add to robots.txt: User-agent: GPTBot Allow: / User-agent: ClaudeBot Allow: /
Run a free AI Visibility scan to check your ACRI score, token bloat, and hallucination risk.
View Full Domain Report →