AI Visibility Gap Identified

threads.com ranks well in traditional search but shows low AI extractability. Here's the analysis — and practical steps to improve.

19
threads.com
Grade F
express
VS
86
agedcarefind.com.au
Grade A
proprietary

Assessment: AI Visibility Gap

threads.com has strong traditional search presence but an ACRI of 19 suggests room for AI-readiness improvement vs agedcarefind.com.au (86 ACRI).

Risk Factor: 348x Token Bloat + JS Rendering Gap

📊 Evidence Dashboard

Evidence Score

80/100
Composite (retrieval 50% + hallucination 30% + bloat 10% + rank 10%)

Retrieval Mismatch

100%
3/3 queries returned a competitor instead

Hallucination Rate

62%
3/8 fields extracted correctly

Token Bloat

348x
HTML tokens per useful content token

🔍 Shadow RAG Probe Results

Each query was run against our FAISS-indexed corpus of 100,000+ domains. The table shows who the retrieval pipeline cited as the top answer.

QueryTypeTop RetrievedACRIResult
What is Threads? entity agedcarefind.com.au 86 ⚠ Mismatch
What features does Threads offer? product agedcarefind.com.au 86 ⚠ Mismatch
best medical services for enterprise comparison agedcarefind.com.au 86 ⚠ Mismatch

🔧 Remediation Checklist for threads.com

Prioritized technical fixes to reclaim AI citation share. Total estimated effort: 1–3 engineering sprints.

Is your domain at risk?

Run a free AI Visibility scan to check your ACRI score, token bloat, and hallucination risk.

View Full Domain Report →