AI Visibility Gap Identified

intercom.io ranks well in traditional search but shows low AI extractability. Here's the analysis — and practical steps to improve.

22
intercom.io
Grade F
nextjs
VS
84
gp-auto.com.ua
Grade A
cloudflare-pages

Assessment: AI Visibility Gap

intercom.io scores 22 ACRI while semantic competitor gp-auto.com.ua scores 84. Enhanced structured data may improve AI extractability.

Risk Factor: 105x Token Bloat + JS Rendering Gap

📊 Evidence Dashboard

Evidence Score

51/100
Composite (retrieval 50% + hallucination 30% + bloat 10% + rank 10%)

Retrieval Mismatch

67%
2/3 queries returned a competitor instead

Hallucination Rate

25%
6/8 fields extracted correctly

Token Bloat

105x
HTML tokens per useful content token

🔍 Shadow RAG Probe Results

Each query was run against our FAISS-indexed corpus of 100,000+ domains. The table shows who the retrieval pipeline cited as the top answer.

QueryTypeTop RetrievedACRIResult
What is Intercom? entity gp-auto.com.ua 84 ⚠ Mismatch
What features does Intercom offer? product intercom.io 22 ✓ Match
best software solution for enterprise comparison gp-auto.com.ua 84 ⚠ Mismatch

🔧 Remediation Checklist for intercom.io

Prioritized technical fixes to reclaim AI citation share. Total estimated effort: 1–3 engineering sprints.

Is your domain at risk?

Run a free AI Visibility scan to check your ACRI score, token bloat, and hallucination risk.

View Full Domain Report →