intercom.io ranks well in traditional search but shows low AI extractability. Here's the analysis — and practical steps to improve.
intercom.io scores 22 ACRI while semantic competitor gp-auto.com.ua scores 84. Enhanced structured data may improve AI extractability.
Each query was run against our FAISS-indexed corpus of 100,000+ domains. The table shows who the retrieval pipeline cited as the top answer.
| Query | Type | Top Retrieved | ACRI | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| What is Intercom? | entity | gp-auto.com.ua | 84 | ⚠ Mismatch |
| What features does Intercom offer? | product | intercom.io | 22 | ✓ Match |
| best software solution for enterprise | comparison | gp-auto.com.ua | 84 | ⚠ Mismatch |
Prioritized technical fixes to reclaim AI citation share. Total estimated effort: 1–3 engineering sprints.
<!-- Add to <head> for AI crawlers: --> <link rel="alternate" type="application/ld+json" href="/structured-data.json"> <!-- Or serve a simplified HTML variant for bot user-agents -->
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "intercom.io",
"url": "https://intercom.io",
"description": "..."
}
</script>
Run a free AI Visibility scan to check your ACRI score, token bloat, and hallucination risk.
View Full Domain Report →