AI Visibility Gap Identified

bing.com ranks well in traditional search but shows low AI extractability. Here's the analysis — and practical steps to improve.

7
bing.com
Grade F
express
VS
90
safely.co.jp
Grade A+
wordpress

Assessment: AI Visibility Gap

bing.com has strong traditional search presence but an ACRI of 7 suggests room for AI-readiness improvement vs safely.co.jp (90 ACRI).

Risk Factor: 1858x Token Bloat + JS Rendering Gap

📊 Evidence Dashboard

Evidence Score

89/100
Composite (retrieval 50% + hallucination 30% + bloat 10% + rank 10%)

Retrieval Mismatch

100%
3/3 queries returned a competitor instead

Hallucination Rate

75%
2/8 fields extracted correctly

Token Bloat

1858x
HTML tokens per useful content token

🔍 Shadow RAG Probe Results

Each query was run against our FAISS-indexed corpus of 100,000+ domains. The table shows who the retrieval pipeline cited as the top answer.

QueryTypeTop RetrievedACRIResult
What is Search? entity safely.co.jp 90 ⚠ Mismatch
What features does Search offer? product safely.co.jp 90 ⚠ Mismatch
best online platform for enterprise comparison safely.co.jp 90 ⚠ Mismatch

🔧 Remediation Checklist for bing.com

Prioritized technical fixes to reclaim AI citation share. Total estimated effort: 1–3 engineering sprints.

Is your domain at risk?

Run a free AI Visibility scan to check your ACRI score, token bloat, and hallucination risk.

View Full Domain Report →