marsh.com vs stonegroup.co.uk
AI Readiness Head-to-Head Comparison
When it comes to AI crawler accessibility, stonegroup.co.uk holds the edge over marsh.com: 87 vs 83 on the AI-Readiness Index. marsh.com took the lead on Tech Stack Quality, Token Efficiency. stonegroup.co.uk won on Rendering / Hydration, Content Structure, Schema Coverage, ACRI Score. Token efficiency favors marsh.com at 1.5× vs stonegroup.co.uk's bloated 2.9×. Wondering how your site compares? Run a free SEODiff scan to find out.
📊 Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | marsh.com | stonegroup.co.uk | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bot Access | 100 | 100 | TIE |
| Rendering / Hydration | 97 | 99WIN | stonegroup.co.uk (+2) |
| Content Structure | 81 | 100WIN | stonegroup.co.uk (+19) |
| Schema Coverage | 42 | 44WIN | stonegroup.co.uk (+2) |
| Tech Stack Quality | 65WIN | 55 | marsh.com (+10) |
| ACRI Score | 79 | 82WIN | stonegroup.co.uk (+3) |
| Token Efficiency | 97WIN | 90 | marsh.com (+7) |
| Overall AI Readiness | 83/100 | 87/100 | 🏆 stonegroup.co.uk |
marsh.com Details
Ghost Ratio10%
Token Bloat1.5×
Schema Count1
RenderingHybrid
GPTBot✅
ClaudeBot✅
ACRI GradeB
Tech StackAdobe Experience Manager
stonegroup.co.uk Details
Ghost Ratio5%
Token Bloat2.9×
Schema Count2
RenderingSSR
GPTBot✅
ClaudeBot✅
ACRI GradeA
Tech StackExpress
📸 Share This Battle
Download a presentation-ready comparison image for social media or pitch decks.
🔍 How Does Your Site Compare?
See where your domain stands against marsh.com and stonegroup.co.uk.