lancom.systems.com vs marsh.com
AI Readiness Head-to-Head Comparison
In the battle for AI visibility, marsh.com defeats lancom.systems.com with an overall AI-Readiness score of 83 to 3 — a 80-point advantage. On Rendering / Hydration and Token Efficiency, lancom.systems.com clearly outperformed. However, marsh.com excelled in Content Structure, Schema Coverage, Tech Stack Quality, ACRI Score. Is your site as AI-ready as marsh.com? Enter your domain above to check.
📊 Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | lancom.systems.com | marsh.com | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bot Access | 100 | 100 | TIE |
| Rendering / Hydration | 100WIN | 97 | lancom.systems.com (+3) |
| Content Structure | 0 | 81WIN | marsh.com (+81) |
| Schema Coverage | 0 | 42WIN | marsh.com (+42) |
| Tech Stack Quality | 50 | 65WIN | marsh.com (+15) |
| ACRI Score | 18 | 79WIN | marsh.com (+61) |
| Token Efficiency | 100WIN | 97 | lancom.systems.com (+3) |
| Overall AI Readiness | 3/100 | 83/100 | 🏆 marsh.com |
lancom.systems.com Details
Ghost Ratio0%
Token Bloat0.0×
Schema Count0
RenderingSSR
GPTBot✅
ClaudeBot✅
ACRI GradeF
Tech StackCustom / Proprietary
marsh.com Details
Ghost Ratio10%
Token Bloat1.5×
Schema Count1
RenderingHybrid
GPTBot✅
ClaudeBot✅
ACRI GradeB
Tech StackAdobe Experience Manager
📸 Share This Battle
Download a presentation-ready comparison image for social media or pitch decks.
🔍 How Does Your Site Compare?
See where your domain stands against lancom.systems.com and marsh.com.