github.com vs automattic.com
AI Readiness Head-to-Head Comparison
When it comes to AI crawler accessibility, automattic.com holds the edge over github.com: 79 vs 74 on the AI-Readiness Index. github.com took the lead on Content Structure, ACRI Score. However, automattic.com excelled in Schema Coverage, Tech Stack Quality. Token efficiency favors automattic.com at 25.4× vs github.com's bloated 38.3×. Wondering how your site compares? Run a free SEODiff scan to find out.
📊 Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | github.com | automattic.com | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bot Access | 100 | 100 | TIE |
| Rendering / Hydration | 100 | 100 | TIE |
| Content Structure | 61WIN | 47 | github.com (+14) |
| Schema Coverage | 0 | 42WIN | automattic.com (+42) |
| Tech Stack Quality | 70 | 85WIN | automattic.com (+15) |
| ACRI Score | 53WIN | 52 | github.com (+1) |
| Token Efficiency | 0 | 0 | TIE |
| Overall AI Readiness | 74/100 | 79/100 | 🏆 automattic.com |
github.com Details
Ghost Ratio0%
Token Bloat38.3×
Schema Count0
RenderingSSR
GPTBot✅
ClaudeBot✅
ACRI GradeD
Tech StackRuby on Rails
automattic.com Details
Ghost Ratio0%
Token Bloat25.4×
Schema Count1
RenderingSSR
GPTBot✅
ClaudeBot✅
ACRI GradeD
Tech StackWordPress
🏗️ Deep Architecture Comparison
Based on 1,000-page deep crawl analysis of each domain's internal architecture.
| Architecture Metric | github.com | automattic.com |
|---|---|---|
| 🔗 Orphan Pages | 13 (92.9%) | 18 (94.7%) |
| 📏 Avg Click Depth | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 🧬 Entity Gap | 8 missing | 3 missing |
| 🎯 Semantic Cohesion | 10% | 8% |
| 📄 Pages Sampled | 14 | 19 |
📸 Share This Battle
Download a presentation-ready comparison image for social media or pitch decks.
🔍 How Does Your Site Compare?
See where your domain stands against github.com and automattic.com.