Aggregate AI readiness comparison across 4272 production sites. This compares all sites built on each framework, not the framework websites themselves.
Webflow Squarespace
The data is in: Squarespace sites generally achieve better AI readiness than Webflow sites. Based on 4272 domains, Squarespace wins 6 of 8 categories. Squarespace sites average an ACRI score of 38.9 compared to 35.5 for Webflow—a meaningful 3-point gap that reflects real differences in how AI crawlers experience these sites. Webflow delivers a 67% leaner Token Bloat ratio (18.6× vs 56.8×), meaning AI systems can extract content more cost-effectively from Webflow-powered sites. On schema coverage, Squarespace averages 2.0 structured data types per site vs 0.5 for Webflow—4.0× more out-of-the-box schema markup. This analysis is based on 2642 Webflow sites and 1630 Squarespace sites from our 100k-domain radar database. Implementation quality varies—scan your own site to see how you compare.
| Metric | Webflow (n=2642) | Squarespace (n=1630) | Δ% | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACRI Score | 35.5 | 38.9WIN | 9% | Squarespace |
| AI Readiness | 64.1 | 65.0WIN | 1% | Squarespace |
| Token Bloat | 18.6×WIN | 56.8× | 67% | Webflow |
| Ghost Ratio | 10% | 10% | 0% | TIE |
| Schema Coverage | 0.5 | 2.0WIN | 75% | Squarespace |
| Schema Adoption | 28% | 72%WIN | 61% | Squarespace |
| GPTBot Access | 97% | 98%WIN | 1% | Squarespace |
| Structure Score | 1.0 | 2.1WIN | 50% | Squarespace |
These are aggregate stats across thousands of sites. Your specific Webflow or Squarespace implementation may outperform or underperform the average.