Aggregate AI readiness comparison across 39653 production sites. This compares all sites built on each framework, not the framework websites themselves.
Svelte/SvelteKit Next.js
The data is in: Next.js sites generally achieve better AI readiness than Svelte/SvelteKit sites. Based on 39653 domains, Next.js wins 8 of 8 categories. Next.js sites average an ACRI score of 41.2 compared to 36.3 for Svelte/SvelteKit—a meaningful 5-point gap that reflects real differences in how AI crawlers experience these sites. Next.js delivers a 30% leaner Token Bloat ratio (161.4× vs 231.4×), meaning AI systems can extract content more cost-effectively from Next.js-powered sites. This analysis is based on 973 Svelte/SvelteKit sites and 38680 Next.js sites from our 100k-domain radar database. Implementation quality varies—scan your own site to see how you compare.
| Metric | Svelte/SvelteKit (n=973) | Next.js (n=38680) | Δ% | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACRI Score | 36.3 | 41.2WIN | 12% | Next.js |
| AI Readiness | 60.0 | 61.3WIN | 2% | Next.js |
| Token Bloat | 231.4× | 161.4×WIN | 30% | Next.js |
| Ghost Ratio | 7% | 6%WIN | 19% | Next.js |
| Schema Coverage | 0.6 | 1.0WIN | 40% | Next.js |
| Schema Adoption | 14% | 27%WIN | 46% | Next.js |
| GPTBot Access | 89% | 93%WIN | 4% | Next.js |
| Structure Score | 5.1 | 6.0WIN | 15% | Next.js |
These are aggregate stats across thousands of sites. Your specific Svelte/SvelteKit or Next.js implementation may outperform or underperform the average.