Aggregate AI readiness comparison across 39646 production sites. This compares all sites built on each framework, not the framework websites themselves.
Next.js Astro
The data is in: Astro sites generally achieve better AI readiness than Next.js sites. Based on 39646 domains, Astro wins 6 of 8 categories. Astro delivers a 69% leaner Token Bloat ratio (49.3× vs 161.4×), meaning AI systems can extract content more cost-effectively from Astro-powered sites. Note: These are aggregate statistics across 38680 Next.js and 966 Astro production deployments. Your specific implementation may differ—run a free scan to check.
| Metric | Next.js (n=38680) | Astro (n=966) | Δ% | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACRI Score | 41.2 | 43.6WIN | 6% | Astro |
| AI Readiness | 61.3 | 69.1WIN | 11% | Astro |
| Token Bloat | 161.4× | 49.3×WIN | 69% | Astro |
| Ghost Ratio | 6% | 5%WIN | 4% | Astro |
| Schema Coverage | 1.0WIN | 0.9 | 10% | Next.js |
| Schema Adoption | 27% | 32%WIN | 17% | Astro |
| GPTBot Access | 93% | 93% | 0% | TIE |
| Structure Score | 6.0 | 6.3WIN | 6% | Astro |
These are aggregate stats across thousands of sites. Your specific Next.js or Astro implementation may outperform or underperform the average.