Aggregate AI readiness comparison across 163048 production sites. This compares all sites built on each framework, not the framework websites themselves.
Joomla WordPress
In a head-to-head framework comparison using 163048 production sites, WordPress takes the lead over Joomla across the majority of AI visibility metrics. On schema coverage, WordPress averages 1.2 structured data types per site vs 0.4 for Joomla—3.0× more out-of-the-box schema markup. This analysis is based on 3349 Joomla sites and 159699 WordPress sites from our 100k-domain radar database. Implementation quality varies—scan your own site to see how you compare.
| Metric | Joomla (n=3349) | WordPress (n=159699) | Δ% | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACRI Score | 54.9 | 54.4 | 1% | TIE |
| AI Readiness | 71.3 | 72.2WIN | 1% | WordPress |
| Token Bloat | 21.3×WIN | 23.8× | 10% | Joomla |
| Ghost Ratio | 0% | 0%WIN | 0% | WordPress |
| Schema Coverage | 0.4 | 1.2WIN | 67% | WordPress |
| Schema Adoption | 16% | 50%WIN | 68% | WordPress |
| GPTBot Access | 96%WIN | 93% | 3% | Joomla |
| Structure Score | 12.1WIN | 8.4 | 30% | Joomla |
These are aggregate stats across thousands of sites. Your specific Joomla or WordPress implementation may outperform or underperform the average.