Aggregate AI readiness comparison across 162570 production sites. This compares all sites built on each framework, not the framework websites themselves.
HubSpot CMS WordPress
The data is in: WordPress sites generally achieve better AI readiness than HubSpot CMS sites. Based on 162570 domains, WordPress wins 7 of 8 categories. WordPress sites average an ACRI score of 54.4 compared to 47.2 for HubSpot CMS—a meaningful 7-point gap that reflects real differences in how AI crawlers experience these sites. WordPress delivers a 70% leaner Token Bloat ratio (23.8× vs 79.8×), meaning AI systems can extract content more cost-effectively from WordPress-powered sites. Server-side rendering favors WordPress with a ghost ratio of 0% compared to 10% for HubSpot CMS. Note: These are aggregate statistics across 2870 HubSpot CMS and 159700 WordPress production deployments. Your specific implementation may differ—run a free scan to check.
| Metric | HubSpot CMS (n=2870) | WordPress (n=159700) | Δ% | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACRI Score | 47.2 | 54.4WIN | 13% | WordPress |
| AI Readiness | 67.9 | 72.2WIN | 6% | WordPress |
| Token Bloat | 79.8× | 23.8×WIN | 70% | WordPress |
| Ghost Ratio | 10% | 0%WIN | 100% | WordPress |
| Schema Coverage | 0.7 | 1.2WIN | 42% | WordPress |
| Schema Adoption | 30% | 50%WIN | 40% | WordPress |
| GPTBot Access | 96%WIN | 93% | 3% | HubSpot CMS |
| Structure Score | 6.5 | 8.4WIN | 23% | WordPress |
These are aggregate stats across thousands of sites. Your specific HubSpot CMS or WordPress implementation may outperform or underperform the average.