🏗️ Architectural Benchmark — Framework Battle

Drupal vs Joomla

Aggregate AI readiness comparison across 13926 production sites. This compares all sites built on each framework, not the framework websites themselves.

Drupal
55
Avg ACRI Score
10577 sites analyzed
VS
Joomla
55
Avg ACRI Score
3349 sites analyzed
🏆 Joomla wins 4 of 8 metrics (0 to Drupal, 4 ties)

📊 Visual Comparison

Drupal   Joomla

🎯 ACRI Score
55.0
54.9
🤖 AI Readiness
71.2
71.3
📊 Token Bloat
21.4×
21.3×
👻 Ghost Ratio
0%
0%
🏷️ Schema Coverage
0.3
0.4
📋 Schema Adoption
12%
16%
🔓 GPTBot Access
95%
96%
📐 Structure Score
10.8
12.1

The data is in: Joomla sites generally achieve better AI readiness than Drupal sites. Based on 13926 domains, Joomla wins 4 of 8 categories. This analysis is based on 10577 Drupal sites and 3349 Joomla sites from our 100k-domain radar database. Implementation quality varies—scan your own site to see how you compare.

📋 Metric-by-Metric Breakdown

Metric Drupal (n=10577) Joomla (n=3349) Δ% Winner
🎯 ACRI Score 55.0 54.9 0% TIE
🤖 AI Readiness 71.2 71.3 0% TIE
📊 Token Bloat 21.4× 21.3× 0% TIE
👻 Ghost Ratio 0% 0%WIN 0% Joomla
🏷️ Schema Coverage 0.3 0.4WIN 25% Joomla
📋 Schema Adoption 12% 16%WIN 28% Joomla
🔓 GPTBot Access 95% 96% 1% TIE
📐 Structure Score 10.8 12.1WIN 11% Joomla

Drupal Aggregate Stats

Sites Analyzed10577
Avg ACRI55.0
Median ACRI56.0
ACRI Stddev±9.6
Avg Token Bloat21.4×
Median Token Bloat4.9×
Avg Ghost Ratio0%
Avg Schema Count0.3
GPTBot Blocked5%

Joomla Aggregate Stats

Sites Analyzed3349
Avg ACRI54.9
Median ACRI55.0
ACRI Stddev±9.9
Avg Token Bloat21.3×
Median Token Bloat5.3×
Avg Ghost Ratio0%
Avg Schema Count0.4
GPTBot Blocked4%

🔍 How Does Your Implementation Compare?

These are aggregate stats across thousands of sites. Your specific Drupal or Joomla implementation may outperform or underperform the average.

🏗️ More Framework Battles

Explore more architectural benchmarks:

View All Framework Battles →