Aggregate AI readiness comparison across 160055 production sites. This compares all sites built on each framework, not the framework websites themselves.
Contentful WordPress
Across 160055 crawled sites, WordPress outperforms Contentful in aggregate AI visibility—winning 7 of 8 metrics in this architectural benchmark. WordPress sites average an ACRI score of 54.4 compared to 40.1 for Contentful—a meaningful 14-point gap that reflects real differences in how AI crawlers experience these sites. WordPress delivers a 82% leaner Token Bloat ratio (23.8× vs 134.6×), meaning AI systems can extract content more cost-effectively from WordPress-powered sites. On schema coverage, WordPress averages 1.2 structured data types per site vs 0.5 for Contentful—2.4× more out-of-the-box schema markup. WordPress sites render 17% less ghost HTML on average (0% vs 17%), delivering more server-side content to AI crawlers. This analysis is based on 358 Contentful sites and 159697 WordPress sites from our 100k-domain radar database. Implementation quality varies—scan your own site to see how you compare.
| Metric | Contentful (n=358) | WordPress (n=159697) | Δ% | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACRI Score | 40.1 | 54.4WIN | 26% | WordPress |
| AI Readiness | 57.9 | 72.2WIN | 20% | WordPress |
| Token Bloat | 134.6× | 23.8×WIN | 82% | WordPress |
| Ghost Ratio | 17% | 0%WIN | 100% | WordPress |
| Schema Coverage | 0.5 | 1.2WIN | 58% | WordPress |
| Schema Adoption | 22% | 50%WIN | 57% | WordPress |
| GPTBot Access | 95%WIN | 93% | 2% | Contentful |
| Structure Score | 6.1 | 8.4WIN | 27% | WordPress |
These are aggregate stats across thousands of sites. Your specific Contentful or WordPress implementation may outperform or underperform the average.