Aggregate AI readiness comparison across 8975 production sites. This compares all sites built on each framework, not the framework websites themselves.
Angular Vue.js
The data is in: Angular sites generally achieve better AI readiness than Vue.js sites. Based on 8975 domains, Angular wins 7 of 8 categories. Angular sites average an ACRI score of 30.9 compared to 27.1 for Vue.js—a meaningful 4-point gap that reflects real differences in how AI crawlers experience these sites. Token efficiency strongly favors Angular (130.2×) over Vue.js (573.4×)—a 77% difference that directly impacts AI processing costs. On schema coverage, Angular averages 0.9 structured data types per site vs 0.3 for Vue.js—3.0× more out-of-the-box schema markup. Angular sites render 7% less ghost HTML on average (37% vs 44%), delivering more server-side content to AI crawlers. Note: These are aggregate statistics across 5068 Angular and 3907 Vue.js production deployments. Your specific implementation may differ—run a free scan to check.
| Metric | Angular (n=5068) | Vue.js (n=3907) | Δ% | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACRI Score | 30.9WIN | 27.1 | 12% | Angular |
| AI Readiness | 44.9WIN | 35.4 | 21% | Angular |
| Token Bloat | 130.2×WIN | 573.4× | 77% | Angular |
| Ghost Ratio | 37%WIN | 44% | 17% | Angular |
| Schema Coverage | 0.9WIN | 0.3 | 67% | Angular |
| Schema Adoption | 15%WIN | 10% | 32% | Angular |
| GPTBot Access | 93%WIN | 74% | 21% | Angular |
| Structure Score | 4.7 | 5.6WIN | 15% | Vue.js |
These are aggregate stats across thousands of sites. Your specific Angular or Vue.js implementation may outperform or underperform the average.