Aggregate AI readiness comparison across 9788 production sites. This compares all sites built on each framework, not the framework websites themselves.
Angular Vue.js
The data is in: Angular sites generally achieve better AI readiness than Vue.js sites. Based on 9788 domains, Angular wins 7 of 8 categories. Angular sites average an ACRI score of 25.0 compared to 19.6 for Vue.js—a meaningful 5-point gap that reflects real differences in how AI crawlers experience these sites. Token efficiency strongly favors Angular (182.2×) over Vue.js (698.1×)—a 74% difference that directly impacts AI processing costs. Angular sites render 14% less ghost HTML on average (45% vs 59%), delivering more server-side content to AI crawlers. Note: These are aggregate statistics across 5614 Angular and 4174 Vue.js production deployments. Your specific implementation may differ—run a free scan to check.
| Metric | Angular (n=5614) | Vue.js (n=4174) | Δ% | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACRI Score | 25.0WIN | 19.6 | 22% | Angular |
| AI Readiness | 36.0WIN | 26.4 | 27% | Angular |
| Token Bloat | 182.2×WIN | 698.1× | 74% | Angular |
| Ghost Ratio | 45%WIN | 59% | 24% | Angular |
| Schema Coverage | 0.8WIN | 0.3 | 62% | Angular |
| Schema Adoption | 13%WIN | 10% | 24% | Angular |
| GPTBot Access | 93%WIN | 75% | 20% | Angular |
| Structure Score | 3.4 | 3.4 | 0% | TIE |
These are aggregate stats across thousands of sites. Your specific Angular or Vue.js implementation may outperform or underperform the average.