AI Readiness Head-to-Head Comparison
When it comes to AI crawler accessibility, automattic.com holds the edge over github.com: 79 vs 74 on the AI-Readiness Index. automattic.com took the lead on Schema Coverage, Tech Stack Quality. However, github.com excelled in Content Structure, ACRI Score. Token efficiency favors automattic.com at 25.4× vs github.com's bloated 38.3×. Wondering how your site compares? Run a free SEODiff scan to find out.
| Metric | automattic.com | github.com | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bot Access | 100 | 100 | TIE |
| Rendering / Hydration | 100 | 100 | TIE |
| Content Structure | 47 | 61WIN | github.com (+14) |
| Schema Coverage | 42WIN | 0 | automattic.com (+42) |
| Tech Stack Quality | 85WIN | 70 | automattic.com (+15) |
| ACRI Score | 52 | 53WIN | github.com (+1) |
| Token Efficiency | 0 | 0 | TIE |
| Overall AI Readiness | 79/100 | 74/100 | 🏆 automattic.com |
Based on 1,000-page deep crawl analysis of each domain's internal architecture.
| Architecture Metric | automattic.com | github.com |
|---|---|---|
| 🔗 Orphan Pages | 18 (94.7%) | 13 (92.9%) |
| 📏 Avg Click Depth | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 🧬 Entity Gap | 3 missing | 8 missing |
| 🎯 Semantic Cohesion | 8% | 10% |
| 📄 Pages Sampled | 19 | 14 |
Download a presentation-ready comparison image for social media or pitch decks.
See where your domain stands against automattic.com and github.com.