arstechnica.com vs github.com
AI Readiness Head-to-Head Comparison
When it comes to AI crawler accessibility, arstechnica.com holds the edge over github.com: 77 vs 74 on the AI-Readiness Index. arstechnica.com dominated in Schema Coverage, Tech Stack Quality, ACRI Score, Token Efficiency. github.com won on Content Structure. Token efficiency favors arstechnica.com at 12.0× vs github.com's bloated 38.4×. Is your site as AI-ready as arstechnica.com? Enter your domain above to check.
📊 Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | arstechnica.com | github.com | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bot Access | 100 | 100 | TIE |
| Rendering / Hydration | 100 | 100 | TIE |
| Content Structure | 36 | 61WIN | github.com (+25) |
| Schema Coverage | 42WIN | 0 | arstechnica.com (+42) |
| Tech Stack Quality | 85WIN | 70 | arstechnica.com (+15) |
| ACRI Score | 55WIN | 53 | arstechnica.com (+2) |
| Token Efficiency | 45WIN | 0 | arstechnica.com (+45) |
| Overall AI Readiness | 77/100 | 74/100 | 🏆 arstechnica.com |
arstechnica.com Details
Ghost Ratio0%
Token Bloat12.0×
Schema Count1
RenderingSSR
GPTBot✅
ClaudeBot✅
ACRI GradeC
Tech StackWordPress
github.com Details
Ghost Ratio0%
Token Bloat38.4×
Schema Count0
RenderingSSR
GPTBot✅
ClaudeBot✅
ACRI GradeD
Tech StackRuby on Rails
🏗️ Deep Architecture Comparison
Based on 1,000-page deep crawl analysis of each domain's internal architecture.
| Architecture Metric | arstechnica.com | github.com |
|---|---|---|
| 🔗 Orphan Pages | 18 (94.7%) | 13 (92.9%) |
| 📏 Avg Click Depth | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 🧬 Entity Gap | 7 missing | 8 missing |
| 🎯 Semantic Cohesion | 4% | 10% |
| 📄 Pages Sampled | 19 | 14 |
📸 Share This Battle
Download a presentation-ready comparison image for social media or pitch decks.
🔍 How Does Your Site Compare?
See where your domain stands against arstechnica.com and github.com.