AI Readiness Head-to-Head Comparison
When it comes to AI crawler accessibility, arstechnica.com holds the edge over anonymised.io: 77 vs 62 on the AI-Readiness Index. arstechnica.com took the lead on Rendering / Hydration, Content Structure, Schema Coverage, Tech Stack Quality, ACRI Score, Token Efficiency. Is your site as AI-ready as arstechnica.com? Enter your domain above to check.
| Metric | arstechnica.com | anonymised.io | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bot Access | 100 | 100 | TIE |
| Rendering / Hydration | 100WIN | 97 | arstechnica.com (+3) |
| Content Structure | 35WIN | 0 | arstechnica.com (+35) |
| Schema Coverage | 42WIN | 0 | arstechnica.com (+42) |
| Tech Stack Quality | 85WIN | 75 | arstechnica.com (+10) |
| ACRI Score | 55WIN | 26 | arstechnica.com (+29) |
| Token Efficiency | 45WIN | 23 | arstechnica.com (+22) |
| Overall AI Readiness | 77/100 | 62/100 | 🏆 arstechnica.com |
Based on 1,000-page deep crawl analysis of each domain's internal architecture.
| Architecture Metric | arstechnica.com | anonymised.io |
|---|---|---|
| 🔗 Orphan Pages | 18 (94.7%) | 49 (98.0%) |
| 📏 Avg Click Depth | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 🧬 Entity Gap | 7 missing | 6 missing |
| 🎯 Semantic Cohesion | 4% | 18% |
| 📄 Pages Sampled | 19 | 50 |
Download a presentation-ready comparison image for social media or pitch decks.
See where your domain stands against arstechnica.com and anonymised.io.