AI Readiness Head-to-Head Comparison
When it comes to AI crawler accessibility, apollo.io holds the edge over authorize.net: 75 vs 62 on the AI-Readiness Index. apollo.io dominated in Rendering / Hydration, Content Structure, Schema Coverage, Tech Stack Quality, ACRI Score. However, authorize.net excelled in Token Efficiency. apollo.io carries significantly more token bloat (48.2×) compared to authorize.net (9.0×), making it costlier for AI systems to process. Is your site as AI-ready as apollo.io? Enter your domain above to check.
| Metric | apollo.io | authorize.net | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bot Access | 100 | 100 | TIE |
| Rendering / Hydration | 99WIN | 94 | apollo.io (+5) |
| Content Structure | 32WIN | 14 | apollo.io (+18) |
| Schema Coverage | 46WIN | 0 | apollo.io (+46) |
| Tech Stack Quality | 70WIN | 55 | apollo.io (+15) |
| ACRI Score | 56WIN | 36 | apollo.io (+20) |
| Token Efficiency | 0 | 60WIN | authorize.net (+60) |
| Overall AI Readiness | 75/100 | 62/100 | 🏆 apollo.io |
Based on 1,000-page deep crawl analysis of each domain's internal architecture.
| Architecture Metric | apollo.io | authorize.net |
|---|---|---|
| 🔗 Orphan Pages | 130 (99.2%) | 321 (99.7%) |
| 📏 Avg Click Depth | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 🧬 Entity Gap | 13 missing | 9 missing |
| 🎯 Semantic Cohesion | 17% | 11% |
| 📄 Pages Sampled | 131 | 322 |
Download a presentation-ready comparison image for social media or pitch decks.
See where your domain stands against apollo.io and authorize.net.