apollo.io vs appdirect.com
AI Readiness Head-to-Head Comparison
In the battle for AI visibility, appdirect.com defeats apollo.io with an overall AI-Readiness score of 84 to 75 — a 9-point advantage. apollo.io took the lead on Schema Coverage, Tech Stack Quality. However, appdirect.com excelled in Content Structure, ACRI Score, Token Efficiency. Token efficiency favors appdirect.com at 2.9× vs apollo.io's bloated 48.2×. See where your site stands — run a free AI-Readiness scan on SEODiff.
📊 Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | apollo.io | appdirect.com | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bot Access | 100 | 100 | TIE |
| Rendering / Hydration | 99 | 99 | TIE |
| Content Structure | 32 | 90WIN | appdirect.com (+58) |
| Schema Coverage | 46WIN | 42 | apollo.io (+4) |
| Tech Stack Quality | 70WIN | 50 | apollo.io (+20) |
| ACRI Score | 56 | 78WIN | appdirect.com (+22) |
| Token Efficiency | 0 | 90WIN | appdirect.com (+90) |
| Overall AI Readiness | 75/100 | 84/100 | 🏆 appdirect.com |
apollo.io Details
Ghost Ratio5%
Token Bloat48.2×
Schema Count3
RenderingSSR
GPTBot✅
ClaudeBot✅
ACRI GradeC
Tech StackNext.js
appdirect.com Details
Ghost Ratio5%
Token Bloat2.9×
Schema Count1
RenderingSSR
GPTBot✅
ClaudeBot✅
ACRI GradeB
Tech StackCustom / Proprietary
🏗️ Deep Architecture Comparison
Based on 1,000-page deep crawl analysis of each domain's internal architecture.
| Architecture Metric | apollo.io | appdirect.com |
|---|---|---|
| 🔗 Orphan Pages | 130 (99.2%) | 1003 (99.9%) |
| 📏 Avg Click Depth | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 🧬 Entity Gap | 13 missing | 22 missing |
| 🎯 Semantic Cohesion | 17% | 3% |
| 📄 Pages Sampled | 131 | 1004 |
📸 Share This Battle
Download a presentation-ready comparison image for social media or pitch decks.
🔍 How Does Your Site Compare?
See where your domain stands against apollo.io and appdirect.com.