apollo.io vs adroll.com
AI Readiness Head-to-Head Comparison
When it comes to AI crawler accessibility, adroll.com holds the edge over apollo.io: 83 vs 75 on the AI-Readiness Index. On Schema Coverage and Tech Stack Quality, apollo.io clearly outperformed. However, adroll.com excelled in Content Structure, ACRI Score, Token Efficiency. apollo.io carries significantly more token bloat (48.2×) compared to adroll.com (3.9×), making it costlier for AI systems to process. Wondering how your site compares? Run a free SEODiff scan to find out.
📊 Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | apollo.io | adroll.com | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bot Access | 100 | 100 | TIE |
| Rendering / Hydration | 99 | 99 | TIE |
| Content Structure | 32 | 85WIN | adroll.com (+53) |
| Schema Coverage | 46WIN | 44 | apollo.io (+2) |
| Tech Stack Quality | 70WIN | 50 | apollo.io (+20) |
| ACRI Score | 56 | 69WIN | adroll.com (+13) |
| Token Efficiency | 0 | 85WIN | adroll.com (+85) |
| Overall AI Readiness | 75/100 | 83/100 | 🏆 adroll.com |
apollo.io Details
Ghost Ratio5%
Token Bloat48.2×
Schema Count3
RenderingSSR
GPTBot✅
ClaudeBot✅
ACRI GradeC
Tech StackNext.js
adroll.com Details
Ghost Ratio5%
Token Bloat3.9×
Schema Count2
RenderingSSR
GPTBot✅
ClaudeBot✅
ACRI GradeC
Tech StackCustom / Proprietary
🏗️ Deep Architecture Comparison
Based on 1,000-page deep crawl analysis of each domain's internal architecture.
| Architecture Metric | apollo.io | adroll.com |
|---|---|---|
| 🔗 Orphan Pages | 130 (99.2%) | 1002 (99.9%) |
| 📏 Avg Click Depth | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 🧬 Entity Gap | 13 missing | 15 missing |
| 🎯 Semantic Cohesion | 17% | 15% |
| 📄 Pages Sampled | 131 | 1003 |
📸 Share This Battle
Download a presentation-ready comparison image for social media or pitch decks.
🔍 How Does Your Site Compare?
See where your domain stands against apollo.io and adroll.com.