ap.org vs appdirect.com
AI Readiness Head-to-Head Comparison
appdirect.com outperforms ap.org in AI-Readiness, scoring 84/100 compared to 78/100 — a decisive 6-point lead. ap.org dominated in Rendering / Hydration, Tech Stack Quality. However, appdirect.com excelled in Content Structure, ACRI Score, Token Efficiency. ap.org carries significantly more token bloat (9.9×) compared to appdirect.com (2.9×), making it costlier for AI systems to process. See where your site stands — run a free AI-Readiness scan on SEODiff.
📊 Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | ap.org | appdirect.com | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bot Access | 100 | 100 | TIE |
| Rendering / Hydration | 100WIN | 99 | ap.org (+1) |
| Content Structure | 43 | 90WIN | appdirect.com (+47) |
| Schema Coverage | 42 | 42 | TIE |
| Tech Stack Quality | 85WIN | 50 | ap.org (+35) |
| ACRI Score | 62 | 78WIN | appdirect.com (+16) |
| Token Efficiency | 55 | 90WIN | appdirect.com (+35) |
| Overall AI Readiness | 78/100 | 84/100 | 🏆 appdirect.com |
ap.org Details
Ghost Ratio0%
Token Bloat9.9×
Schema Count1
RenderingSSR
GPTBot✅
ClaudeBot✅
ACRI GradeC
Tech StackWordPress
appdirect.com Details
Ghost Ratio5%
Token Bloat2.9×
Schema Count1
RenderingSSR
GPTBot✅
ClaudeBot✅
ACRI GradeB
Tech StackCustom / Proprietary
🏗️ Deep Architecture Comparison
Based on 1,000-page deep crawl analysis of each domain's internal architecture.
| Architecture Metric | ap.org | appdirect.com |
|---|---|---|
| 🔗 Orphan Pages | 996 (99.9%) | 1003 (99.9%) |
| 📏 Avg Click Depth | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 🧬 Entity Gap | 9 missing | 22 missing |
| 🎯 Semantic Cohesion | 13% | 3% |
| 📄 Pages Sampled | 997 | 1004 |
📸 Share This Battle
Download a presentation-ready comparison image for social media or pitch decks.
🔍 How Does Your Site Compare?
See where your domain stands against ap.org and appdirect.com.