ap.org vs anthropic.com
AI Readiness Head-to-Head Comparison
anthropic.com outperforms ap.org in AI-Readiness, scoring 80/100 compared to 78/100 — a decisive 2-point lead. ap.org dominated in Rendering / Hydration, Schema Coverage, Tech Stack Quality, ACRI Score, Token Efficiency. However, anthropic.com excelled in Content Structure. anthropic.com carries significantly more token bloat (49.1×) compared to ap.org (9.9×), making it costlier for AI systems to process. Wondering how your site compares? Run a free SEODiff scan to find out.
📊 Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | ap.org | anthropic.com | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bot Access | 100 | 100 | TIE |
| Rendering / Hydration | 100WIN | 97 | ap.org (+3) |
| Content Structure | 43 | 89WIN | anthropic.com (+46) |
| Schema Coverage | 42WIN | 0 | ap.org (+42) |
| Tech Stack Quality | 85WIN | 75 | ap.org (+10) |
| ACRI Score | 62WIN | 53 | ap.org (+9) |
| Token Efficiency | 55WIN | 0 | ap.org (+55) |
| Overall AI Readiness | 78/100 | 80/100 | 🏆 anthropic.com |
ap.org Details
Ghost Ratio0%
Token Bloat9.9×
Schema Count1
RenderingSSR
GPTBot✅
ClaudeBot✅
ACRI GradeC
Tech StackWordPress
anthropic.com Details
Ghost Ratio10%
Token Bloat49.1×
Schema Count0
RenderingHybrid
GPTBot✅
ClaudeBot✅
ACRI GradeD
Tech StackWebflow
🏗️ Deep Architecture Comparison
Based on 1,000-page deep crawl analysis of each domain's internal architecture.
| Architecture Metric | ap.org | anthropic.com |
|---|---|---|
| 🔗 Orphan Pages | 996 (99.9%) | 350 (99.7%) |
| 📏 Avg Click Depth | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 🧬 Entity Gap | 9 missing | 20 missing |
| 🎯 Semantic Cohesion | 13% | 19% |
| 📄 Pages Sampled | 997 | 351 |
📸 Share This Battle
Download a presentation-ready comparison image for social media or pitch decks.
🔍 How Does Your Site Compare?
See where your domain stands against ap.org and anthropic.com.