AI Readiness Head-to-Head Comparison
When it comes to AI crawler accessibility, appdirect.com holds the edge over anonymised.io: 84 vs 62 on the AI-Readiness Index. On Tech Stack Quality, anonymised.io clearly outperformed. Meanwhile, appdirect.com took Rendering / Hydration, Content Structure, Schema Coverage, ACRI Score, Token Efficiency. anonymised.io carries significantly more token bloat (16.3×) compared to appdirect.com (2.9×), making it costlier for AI systems to process. Wondering how your site compares? Run a free SEODiff scan to find out.
| Metric | anonymised.io | appdirect.com | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bot Access | 100 | 100 | TIE |
| Rendering / Hydration | 97 | 99WIN | appdirect.com (+2) |
| Content Structure | 0 | 90WIN | appdirect.com (+90) |
| Schema Coverage | 0 | 42WIN | appdirect.com (+42) |
| Tech Stack Quality | 75WIN | 50 | anonymised.io (+25) |
| ACRI Score | 26 | 78WIN | appdirect.com (+52) |
| Token Efficiency | 23 | 90WIN | appdirect.com (+67) |
| Overall AI Readiness | 62/100 | 84/100 | 🏆 appdirect.com |
Based on 1,000-page deep crawl analysis of each domain's internal architecture.
| Architecture Metric | anonymised.io | appdirect.com |
|---|---|---|
| 🔗 Orphan Pages | 49 (98.0%) | Not analyzed |
| 📏 Avg Click Depth | 0.0 | — |
| 🧬 Entity Gap | 6 missing | — |
| 🎯 Semantic Cohesion | 18% | — |
| 📄 Pages Sampled | 50 | — |
Download a presentation-ready comparison image for social media or pitch decks.
See where your domain stands against anonymised.io and appdirect.com.