airtable.com vs act.org
AI Readiness Head-to-Head Comparison
When it comes to AI crawler accessibility, airtable.com holds the edge over act.org: 81 vs 70 on the AI-Readiness Index. On Rendering / Hydration and Content Structure and Schema Coverage and ACRI Score, airtable.com clearly outperformed. However, act.org excelled in Token Efficiency. Token efficiency favors act.org at 3.6× vs airtable.com's bloated 11.2×. See where your site stands — run a free AI-Readiness scan on SEODiff.
📊 Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | airtable.com | act.org | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bot Access | 100 | 100 | TIE |
| Rendering / Hydration | 99WIN | 97 | airtable.com (+2) |
| Content Structure | 66WIN | 44 | airtable.com (+22) |
| Schema Coverage | 42WIN | 0 | airtable.com (+42) |
| Tech Stack Quality | 70 | 70 | TIE |
| ACRI Score | 66WIN | 50 | airtable.com (+16) |
| Token Efficiency | 49 | 87WIN | act.org (+38) |
| Overall AI Readiness | 81/100 | 70/100 | 🏆 airtable.com |
airtable.com Details
Ghost Ratio5%
Token Bloat11.2×
Schema Count1
RenderingSSR
GPTBot✅
ClaudeBot✅
ACRI GradeC
Tech StackNext.js
act.org Details
Ghost Ratio10%
Token Bloat3.6×
Schema Count0
RenderingHybrid
GPTBot✅
ClaudeBot✅
ACRI GradeD
Tech StackHubSpot CMS
🏗️ Deep Architecture Comparison
Based on 1,000-page deep crawl analysis of each domain's internal architecture.
| Architecture Metric | airtable.com | act.org |
|---|---|---|
| 🔗 Orphan Pages | 998 (99.9%) | 900 (99.9%) |
| 📏 Avg Click Depth | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 🧬 Entity Gap | 14 missing | 7 missing |
| 🎯 Semantic Cohesion | 6% | 14% |
| 📄 Pages Sampled | 999 | 901 |
📸 Share This Battle
Download a presentation-ready comparison image for social media or pitch decks.
🔍 How Does Your Site Compare?
See where your domain stands against airtable.com and act.org.