affirm.com vs apollo.io
AI Readiness Head-to-Head Comparison
When it comes to AI crawler accessibility, apollo.io holds the edge over affirm.com: 75 vs 67 on the AI-Readiness Index. affirm.com dominated in Tech Stack Quality. apollo.io won on Content Structure, Schema Coverage, ACRI Score. apollo.io carries significantly more token bloat (48.3×) compared to affirm.com (21.4×), making it costlier for AI systems to process. Is your site as AI-ready as apollo.io? Enter your domain above to check.
📊 Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | affirm.com | apollo.io | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bot Access | 100 | 100 | TIE |
| Rendering / Hydration | 99 | 99 | TIE |
| Content Structure | 23 | 32WIN | apollo.io (+9) |
| Schema Coverage | 0 | 46WIN | apollo.io (+46) |
| Tech Stack Quality | 75WIN | 70 | affirm.com (+5) |
| ACRI Score | 39 | 56WIN | apollo.io (+17) |
| Token Efficiency | 0 | 0 | TIE |
| Overall AI Readiness | 67/100 | 75/100 | 🏆 apollo.io |
affirm.com Details
Ghost Ratio5%
Token Bloat21.4×
Schema Count0
RenderingSSR
GPTBot✅
ClaudeBot✅
ACRI GradeF
Tech StackGatsby
apollo.io Details
Ghost Ratio5%
Token Bloat48.3×
Schema Count3
RenderingSSR
GPTBot✅
ClaudeBot✅
ACRI GradeC
Tech StackNext.js
🏗️ Deep Architecture Comparison
Based on 1,000-page deep crawl analysis of each domain's internal architecture.
| Architecture Metric | affirm.com | apollo.io |
|---|---|---|
| 🔗 Orphan Pages | 321 (99.7%) | 130 (99.2%) |
| 📏 Avg Click Depth | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 🧬 Entity Gap | 8 missing | 13 missing |
| 🎯 Semantic Cohesion | 10% | 17% |
| 📄 Pages Sampled | 322 | 131 |
📸 Share This Battle
Download a presentation-ready comparison image for social media or pitch decks.
🔍 How Does Your Site Compare?
See where your domain stands against affirm.com and apollo.io.