adroll.com vs apollo.io
AI Readiness Head-to-Head Comparison
When it comes to AI crawler accessibility, adroll.com holds the edge over apollo.io: 83 vs 75 on the AI-Readiness Index. On Content Structure and ACRI Score and Token Efficiency, adroll.com clearly outperformed. However, apollo.io excelled in Schema Coverage, Tech Stack Quality. apollo.io carries significantly more token bloat (48.2×) compared to adroll.com (3.9×), making it costlier for AI systems to process. Wondering how your site compares? Run a free SEODiff scan to find out.
📊 Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | adroll.com | apollo.io | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bot Access | 100 | 100 | TIE |
| Rendering / Hydration | 99 | 99 | TIE |
| Content Structure | 85WIN | 32 | adroll.com (+53) |
| Schema Coverage | 44 | 46WIN | apollo.io (+2) |
| Tech Stack Quality | 50 | 70WIN | apollo.io (+20) |
| ACRI Score | 69WIN | 56 | adroll.com (+13) |
| Token Efficiency | 85WIN | 0 | adroll.com (+85) |
| Overall AI Readiness | 83/100 | 75/100 | 🏆 adroll.com |
adroll.com Details
Ghost Ratio5%
Token Bloat3.9×
Schema Count2
RenderingSSR
GPTBot✅
ClaudeBot✅
ACRI GradeC
Tech StackCustom / Proprietary
apollo.io Details
Ghost Ratio5%
Token Bloat48.2×
Schema Count3
RenderingSSR
GPTBot✅
ClaudeBot✅
ACRI GradeC
Tech StackNext.js
🏗️ Deep Architecture Comparison
Based on 1,000-page deep crawl analysis of each domain's internal architecture.
| Architecture Metric | adroll.com | apollo.io |
|---|---|---|
| 🔗 Orphan Pages | 1002 (99.9%) | 130 (99.2%) |
| 📏 Avg Click Depth | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 🧬 Entity Gap | 15 missing | 13 missing |
| 🎯 Semantic Cohesion | 15% | 17% |
| 📄 Pages Sampled | 1003 | 131 |
📸 Share This Battle
Download a presentation-ready comparison image for social media or pitch decks.
🔍 How Does Your Site Compare?
See where your domain stands against adroll.com and apollo.io.