admiral.com vs apollo.io
AI Readiness Head-to-Head Comparison
Our analysis reveals admiral.com as the clear winner over apollo.io in AI visibility — 83 to 75, a gap of 8 points. On Rendering / Hydration and Content Structure and Schema Coverage and ACRI Score and Token Efficiency, admiral.com clearly outperformed. apollo.io carries significantly more token bloat (48.3×) compared to admiral.com (3.2×), making it costlier for AI systems to process. See where your site stands — run a free AI-Readiness scan on SEODiff.
📊 Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | admiral.com | apollo.io | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bot Access | 100 | 100 | TIE |
| Rendering / Hydration | 100WIN | 99 | admiral.com (+1) |
| Content Structure | 69WIN | 32 | admiral.com (+37) |
| Schema Coverage | 48WIN | 46 | admiral.com (+2) |
| Tech Stack Quality | 70 | 70 | TIE |
| ACRI Score | 75WIN | 56 | admiral.com (+19) |
| Token Efficiency | 88WIN | 0 | admiral.com (+88) |
| Overall AI Readiness | 83/100 | 75/100 | 🏆 admiral.com |
admiral.com Details
Ghost Ratio0%
Token Bloat3.2×
Schema Count4
RenderingSSR
GPTBot✅
ClaudeBot✅
ACRI GradeB
Tech StackDrupal
apollo.io Details
Ghost Ratio5%
Token Bloat48.3×
Schema Count3
RenderingSSR
GPTBot✅
ClaudeBot✅
ACRI GradeC
Tech StackNext.js
🏗️ Deep Architecture Comparison
Based on 1,000-page deep crawl analysis of each domain's internal architecture.
| Architecture Metric | admiral.com | apollo.io |
|---|---|---|
| 🔗 Orphan Pages | 884 (99.9%) | 130 (99.2%) |
| 📏 Avg Click Depth | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 🧬 Entity Gap | 6 missing | 13 missing |
| 🎯 Semantic Cohesion | 41% | 17% |
| 📄 Pages Sampled | 885 | 131 |
📸 Share This Battle
Download a presentation-ready comparison image for social media or pitch decks.
🔍 How Does Your Site Compare?
See where your domain stands against admiral.com and apollo.io.