acast.com vs apollo.io
AI Readiness Head-to-Head Comparison
When it comes to AI crawler accessibility, apollo.io holds the edge over acast.com: 75 vs 62 on the AI-Readiness Index. acast.com took the lead on Tech Stack Quality, Token Efficiency. Meanwhile, apollo.io took Rendering / Hydration, Content Structure, Schema Coverage, ACRI Score. apollo.io carries significantly more token bloat (48.3×) compared to acast.com (15.5×), making it costlier for AI systems to process. See where your site stands — run a free AI-Readiness scan on SEODiff.
📊 Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | acast.com | apollo.io | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bot Access | 100 | 100 | TIE |
| Rendering / Hydration | 97 | 99WIN | apollo.io (+2) |
| Content Structure | 0 | 32WIN | apollo.io (+32) |
| Schema Coverage | 0 | 46WIN | apollo.io (+46) |
| Tech Stack Quality | 75WIN | 70 | acast.com (+5) |
| ACRI Score | 30 | 56WIN | apollo.io (+26) |
| Token Efficiency | 27WIN | 0 | acast.com (+27) |
| Overall AI Readiness | 62/100 | 75/100 | 🏆 apollo.io |
acast.com Details
Ghost Ratio10%
Token Bloat15.5×
Schema Count0
RenderingHybrid
GPTBot✅
ClaudeBot✅
ACRI GradeF
Tech StackWebflow
apollo.io Details
Ghost Ratio5%
Token Bloat48.3×
Schema Count3
RenderingSSR
GPTBot✅
ClaudeBot✅
ACRI GradeC
Tech StackNext.js
🏗️ Deep Architecture Comparison
Based on 1,000-page deep crawl analysis of each domain's internal architecture.
| Architecture Metric | acast.com | apollo.io |
|---|---|---|
| 🔗 Orphan Pages | 952 (99.9%) | 130 (99.2%) |
| 📏 Avg Click Depth | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 🧬 Entity Gap | 7 missing | 13 missing |
| 🎯 Semantic Cohesion | 23% | 17% |
| 📄 Pages Sampled | 953 | 131 |
📸 Share This Battle
Download a presentation-ready comparison image for social media or pitch decks.
🔍 How Does Your Site Compare?
See where your domain stands against acast.com and apollo.io.