acast.com vs ahrefs.com
AI Readiness Head-to-Head Comparison
When it comes to AI crawler accessibility, ahrefs.com holds the edge over acast.com: 72 vs 62 on the AI-Readiness Index. On Token Efficiency, acast.com clearly outperformed. ahrefs.com won on Content Structure, Schema Coverage, ACRI Score. ahrefs.com carries significantly more token bloat (57.6×) compared to acast.com (15.5×), making it costlier for AI systems to process. Is your site as AI-ready as ahrefs.com? Enter your domain above to check.
📊 Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | acast.com | ahrefs.com | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bot Access | 100 | 100 | TIE |
| Rendering / Hydration | 97 | 97 | TIE |
| Content Structure | 0 | 22WIN | ahrefs.com (+22) |
| Schema Coverage | 0 | 42WIN | ahrefs.com (+42) |
| Tech Stack Quality | 75 | 75 | TIE |
| ACRI Score | 30 | 43WIN | ahrefs.com (+13) |
| Token Efficiency | 27WIN | 0 | acast.com (+27) |
| Overall AI Readiness | 62/100 | 72/100 | 🏆 ahrefs.com |
acast.com Details
Ghost Ratio10%
Token Bloat15.5×
Schema Count0
RenderingHybrid
GPTBot✅
ClaudeBot✅
ACRI GradeF
Tech StackWebflow
ahrefs.com Details
Ghost Ratio10%
Token Bloat57.6×
Schema Count1
RenderingHybrid
GPTBot✅
ClaudeBot✅
ACRI GradeD
Tech StackCloudflare Pages
🏗️ Deep Architecture Comparison
Based on 1,000-page deep crawl analysis of each domain's internal architecture.
| Architecture Metric | acast.com | ahrefs.com |
|---|---|---|
| 🔗 Orphan Pages | 952 (99.9%) | 292 (99.7%) |
| 📏 Avg Click Depth | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 🧬 Entity Gap | 7 missing | 11 missing |
| 🎯 Semantic Cohesion | 23% | 16% |
| 📄 Pages Sampled | 953 | 293 |
📸 Share This Battle
Download a presentation-ready comparison image for social media or pitch decks.
🔍 How Does Your Site Compare?
See where your domain stands against acast.com and ahrefs.com.