aarp.org vs ap.org
AI Readiness Head-to-Head Comparison
ap.org outperforms aarp.org in AI-Readiness, scoring 78/100 compared to 62/100 — a decisive 16-point lead. aarp.org took the lead on Token Efficiency. ap.org won on Bot Access, Rendering / Hydration, Content Structure, Schema Coverage, Tech Stack Quality, ACRI Score. Token efficiency favors aarp.org at 6.2× vs ap.org's bloated 9.5×. Is your site as AI-ready as ap.org? Enter your domain above to check.
📊 Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | aarp.org | ap.org | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bot Access | 80 | 100WIN | ap.org (+20) |
| Rendering / Hydration | 99 | 100WIN | ap.org (+1) |
| Content Structure | 38 | 42WIN | ap.org (+4) |
| Schema Coverage | 2 | 42WIN | ap.org (+40) |
| Tech Stack Quality | 55 | 85WIN | ap.org (+30) |
| ACRI Score | 52 | 61WIN | ap.org (+9) |
| Token Efficiency | 74WIN | 57 | aarp.org (+17) |
| Overall AI Readiness | 62/100 | 78/100 | 🏆 ap.org |
aarp.org Details
Ghost Ratio5%
Token Bloat6.2×
Schema Count1
RenderingSSR
GPTBot✅
ClaudeBot✅
ACRI GradeD
Tech StackExpress
ap.org Details
Ghost Ratio0%
Token Bloat9.5×
Schema Count1
RenderingSSR
GPTBot✅
ClaudeBot✅
ACRI GradeC
Tech StackWordPress
🏗️ Deep Architecture Comparison
Based on 1,000-page deep crawl analysis of each domain's internal architecture.
| Architecture Metric | aarp.org | ap.org |
|---|---|---|
| 🔗 Orphan Pages | 999 (99.9%) | 996 (99.9%) |
| 📏 Avg Click Depth | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 🧬 Entity Gap | 8 missing | 9 missing |
| 🎯 Semantic Cohesion | 47% | 13% |
| 📄 Pages Sampled | 1000 | 997 |
📸 Share This Battle
Download a presentation-ready comparison image for social media or pitch decks.
🔍 How Does Your Site Compare?
See where your domain stands against aarp.org and ap.org.