9to5mac.com vs apollo.io
AI Readiness Head-to-Head Comparison
apollo.io outperforms 9to5mac.com in AI-Readiness, scoring 75/100 compared to 73/100 — a decisive 2-point lead. 9to5mac.com dominated in Rendering / Hydration, Content Structure, Tech Stack Quality, ACRI Score, Token Efficiency. However, apollo.io excelled in Schema Coverage. Token efficiency favors 9to5mac.com at 9.9× vs apollo.io's bloated 48.2×. Wondering how your site compares? Run a free SEODiff scan to find out.
📊 Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | 9to5mac.com | apollo.io | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bot Access | 100 | 100 | TIE |
| Rendering / Hydration | 100WIN | 99 | 9to5mac.com (+1) |
| Content Structure | 47WIN | 32 | 9to5mac.com (+15) |
| Schema Coverage | 2 | 46WIN | apollo.io (+44) |
| Tech Stack Quality | 85WIN | 70 | 9to5mac.com (+15) |
| ACRI Score | 60WIN | 56 | 9to5mac.com (+4) |
| Token Efficiency | 55WIN | 0 | 9to5mac.com (+55) |
| Overall AI Readiness | 73/100 | 75/100 | 🏆 apollo.io |
9to5mac.com Details
Ghost Ratio0%
Token Bloat9.9×
Schema Count1
RenderingSSR
GPTBot✅
ClaudeBot✅
ACRI GradeC
Tech StackWordPress
apollo.io Details
Ghost Ratio5%
Token Bloat48.2×
Schema Count3
RenderingSSR
GPTBot✅
ClaudeBot✅
ACRI GradeC
Tech StackNext.js
🏗️ Deep Architecture Comparison
Based on 1,000-page deep crawl analysis of each domain's internal architecture.
| Architecture Metric | 9to5mac.com | apollo.io |
|---|---|---|
| 🔗 Orphan Pages | 1005 (99.9%) | 130 (99.2%) |
| 📏 Avg Click Depth | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 🧬 Entity Gap | 12 missing | 13 missing |
| 🎯 Semantic Cohesion | 15% | 17% |
| 📄 Pages Sampled | 1006 | 131 |
📸 Share This Battle
Download a presentation-ready comparison image for social media or pitch decks.
🔍 How Does Your Site Compare?
See where your domain stands against 9to5mac.com and apollo.io.