2k.com vs apollo.io
AI Readiness Head-to-Head Comparison
apollo.io outperforms 2k.com in AI-Readiness, scoring 75/100 compared to 67/100 — a decisive 8-point lead. On Content Structure, 2k.com clearly outperformed. apollo.io won on Rendering / Hydration, Schema Coverage, Tech Stack Quality, ACRI Score. 2k.com carries significantly more token bloat (169.8×) compared to apollo.io (48.3×), making it costlier for AI systems to process. apollo.io renders more content server-side (ghost ratio: 5% vs 30%), giving AI crawlers direct access to visible content. See where your site stands — run a free AI-Readiness scan on SEODiff.
📊 Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | 2k.com | apollo.io | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bot Access | 100 | 100 | TIE |
| Rendering / Hydration | 84 | 99WIN | apollo.io (+15) |
| Content Structure | 52WIN | 32 | 2k.com (+20) |
| Schema Coverage | 0 | 46WIN | apollo.io (+46) |
| Tech Stack Quality | 55 | 70WIN | apollo.io (+15) |
| ACRI Score | 40 | 56WIN | apollo.io (+16) |
| Token Efficiency | 0 | 0 | TIE |
| Overall AI Readiness | 67/100 | 75/100 | 🏆 apollo.io |
2k.com Details
apollo.io Details
🏗️ Deep Architecture Comparison
Based on 1,000-page deep crawl analysis of each domain's internal architecture.
| Architecture Metric | 2k.com | apollo.io |
|---|---|---|
| 🔗 Orphan Pages | 122 (99.2%) | 130 (99.2%) |
| 📏 Avg Click Depth | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 🧬 Entity Gap | 4 missing | 13 missing |
| 🎯 Semantic Cohesion | 23% | 17% |
| 📄 Pages Sampled | 123 | 131 |
📸 Share This Battle
Download a presentation-ready comparison image for social media or pitch decks.
🔍 How Does Your Site Compare?
See where your domain stands against 2k.com and apollo.io.