2k.com vs aol.com
AI Readiness Head-to-Head Comparison
Our analysis reveals 2k.com as the clear winner over aol.com in AI visibility — 67 to 15, a gap of 52 points. 2k.com took the lead on Bot Access, Content Structure, Tech Stack Quality, ACRI Score. aol.com won on Rendering / Hydration. Token efficiency favors aol.com at 41.1× vs 2k.com's bloated 169.8×. aol.com renders more content server-side (ghost ratio: 10% vs 30%), giving AI crawlers direct access to visible content. See where your site stands — run a free AI-Readiness scan on SEODiff.
📊 Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | 2k.com | aol.com | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bot Access | 100WIN | 20 | 2k.com (+80) |
| Rendering / Hydration | 84 | 97WIN | aol.com (+13) |
| Content Structure | 52WIN | 0 | 2k.com (+52) |
| Schema Coverage | 0 | 0 | TIE |
| Tech Stack Quality | 55WIN | 50 | 2k.com (+5) |
| ACRI Score | 40WIN | 13 | 2k.com (+27) |
| Token Efficiency | 0 | 0 | TIE |
| Overall AI Readiness | 67/100 | 15/100 | 🏆 2k.com |
2k.com Details
Ghost Ratio30%
Token Bloat169.8×
Schema Count0
RenderingHybrid
GPTBot✅
ClaudeBot✅
ACRI GradeD
Tech StackExpress
aol.com Details
Ghost Ratio10%
Token Bloat41.1×
Schema Count0
RenderingHybrid
GPTBot❌
ClaudeBot❌
ACRI GradeF
Tech StackCustom / Proprietary
🏗️ Deep Architecture Comparison
Based on 1,000-page deep crawl analysis of each domain's internal architecture.
| Architecture Metric | 2k.com | aol.com |
|---|---|---|
| 🔗 Orphan Pages | 122 (99.2%) | 912 (99.9%) |
| 📏 Avg Click Depth | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 🧬 Entity Gap | 4 missing | 8 missing |
| 🎯 Semantic Cohesion | 23% | 2% |
| 📄 Pages Sampled | 123 | 913 |
📸 Share This Battle
Download a presentation-ready comparison image for social media or pitch decks.
🔍 How Does Your Site Compare?
See where your domain stands against 2k.com and aol.com.