17track.net vs appdirect.com
AI Readiness Head-to-Head Comparison
In the battle for AI visibility, appdirect.com defeats 17track.net with an overall AI-Readiness score of 84 to 70 — a 14-point advantage. 17track.net took the lead on Schema Coverage, Tech Stack Quality. However, appdirect.com excelled in Content Structure, ACRI Score, Token Efficiency. Token efficiency favors appdirect.com at 2.9× vs 17track.net's bloated 11.8×. See where your site stands — run a free AI-Readiness scan on SEODiff.
📊 Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | 17track.net | appdirect.com | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bot Access | 100 | 100 | TIE |
| Rendering / Hydration | 99 | 99 | TIE |
| Content Structure | 10 | 90WIN | appdirect.com (+80) |
| Schema Coverage | 44WIN | 42 | 17track.net (+2) |
| Tech Stack Quality | 70WIN | 50 | 17track.net (+20) |
| ACRI Score | 45 | 78WIN | appdirect.com (+33) |
| Token Efficiency | 45 | 90WIN | appdirect.com (+45) |
| Overall AI Readiness | 70/100 | 84/100 | 🏆 appdirect.com |
17track.net Details
Ghost Ratio5%
Token Bloat11.8×
Schema Count2
RenderingSSR
GPTBot✅
ClaudeBot✅
ACRI GradeD
Tech StackNext.js
appdirect.com Details
Ghost Ratio5%
Token Bloat2.9×
Schema Count1
RenderingSSR
GPTBot✅
ClaudeBot✅
ACRI GradeB
Tech StackCustom / Proprietary
🏗️ Deep Architecture Comparison
Based on 1,000-page deep crawl analysis of each domain's internal architecture.
| Architecture Metric | 17track.net | appdirect.com |
|---|---|---|
| 🔗 Orphan Pages | 999 (99.9%) | Not analyzed |
| 📏 Avg Click Depth | 0.0 | — |
| 🧬 Entity Gap | 9 missing | — |
| 🎯 Semantic Cohesion | 4% | — |
| 📄 Pages Sampled | 1000 | — |
📸 Share This Battle
Download a presentation-ready comparison image for social media or pitch decks.
🔍 How Does Your Site Compare?
See where your domain stands against 17track.net and appdirect.com.