17track.net vs apollo.io
AI Readiness Head-to-Head Comparison
In the battle for AI visibility, apollo.io defeats 17track.net with an overall AI-Readiness score of 75 to 70 — a 5-point advantage. On Token Efficiency, 17track.net clearly outperformed. Meanwhile, apollo.io took Content Structure, Schema Coverage, ACRI Score. Token efficiency favors 17track.net at 11.8× vs apollo.io's bloated 48.3×. Is your site as AI-ready as apollo.io? Enter your domain above to check.
📊 Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | 17track.net | apollo.io | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bot Access | 100 | 100 | TIE |
| Rendering / Hydration | 99 | 99 | TIE |
| Content Structure | 10 | 32WIN | apollo.io (+22) |
| Schema Coverage | 44 | 46WIN | apollo.io (+2) |
| Tech Stack Quality | 70 | 70 | TIE |
| ACRI Score | 45 | 56WIN | apollo.io (+11) |
| Token Efficiency | 45WIN | 0 | 17track.net (+45) |
| Overall AI Readiness | 70/100 | 75/100 | 🏆 apollo.io |
17track.net Details
Ghost Ratio5%
Token Bloat11.8×
Schema Count2
RenderingSSR
GPTBot✅
ClaudeBot✅
ACRI GradeD
Tech StackNext.js
apollo.io Details
Ghost Ratio5%
Token Bloat48.3×
Schema Count3
RenderingSSR
GPTBot✅
ClaudeBot✅
ACRI GradeC
Tech StackNext.js
🏗️ Deep Architecture Comparison
Based on 1,000-page deep crawl analysis of each domain's internal architecture.
| Architecture Metric | 17track.net | apollo.io |
|---|---|---|
| 🔗 Orphan Pages | 999 (99.9%) | 130 (99.2%) |
| 📏 Avg Click Depth | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 🧬 Entity Gap | 9 missing | 13 missing |
| 🎯 Semantic Cohesion | 4% | 17% |
| 📄 Pages Sampled | 1000 | 131 |
📸 Share This Battle
Download a presentation-ready comparison image for social media or pitch decks.
🔍 How Does Your Site Compare?
See where your domain stands against 17track.net and apollo.io.